Question

Mr. Fulford,

In your commentary you reference the Pentagon.

Do we have multiple Pentagons that serve both sides of this end of times conflict?

I read stories about the Unified Commands that report to the Secretary of Defense, like USAFRICACOM who are involved with putting down the unrest that is caused by the IMF and Goldman Sachs representatives in the Lagos government.  

USAFRICACOM sounds like a police force for the global elites.  

And since these unified commands were installed under Bush II it seems that the six global unified commands are nothing more than a growing global force that is controlled by the elites and operate as a force "protecting the national security interests of the United States".  

Their mission is to fight the global war on terrorism.  

And we all know that the IMF is just one of the tools that the global elites use to squeeze the wealth out of small nations.  Please read the article below.   

This is a good article that explains how the global elites through ......the auspices of Western governments .....are able to gain control of countries ....and plunder their natural resources.........thereby increasing the hatred of West by the people and .......the potential of civil unrest and war.

The tactics used in Africa are being slowly imposed here in the US........and given the debt the US has with the IMF .....it is only a matter of time when the big squeeze will be put on the American people ...........when our debt bubble bursts.

That is why the American people need to pursue legal recourse to recover from the elites the wealth being stolen from all peoples of the Earth.  

The IMF are the true global terrorists of the world, ..............absorbing the world's wealth by squeezing the people.   

It is tragic how the people of the world ..................are being enslaved by the debts of its leaders.............Sound familiar?     

Is this what the good guys in the Pentagon are fighting............OUR OWN UNIFIED COMMAND STRUCTRUE?

Lagos Dissents Under IMF Hegemony

Nigeria: The Next Front for AFRICOM

On a recent trip to West Africa, the newly appointed managing director of the International Monetary Fund,Christine Lagarde ordered the governments of Nigeria, Guinea, Cameroon, Ghana and Chad to relinquish vital fuel subsidies.

Much to the dismay of the population of these nations, the prices of fuel and transport have near tripled over night without notice, causing widespread violence on the streets of the Nigerian capital of Abuja and its economic center, Lagos.

Much like the IMF induced riots in Indonesia during the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis, public discontent in Nigeria is channelled towards an incompetent and self-serving domestic elite, compliant to the interests of fraudulent foreign institutions. 

Although Nigeria holds the most proven oil reserves in Africa behind Libya, it’s people are now expected to pay a fee closer to what the average American pays for the cost of fuel, an exorbitant sum in contrast to its regional neighbours.

Alternatively, other oil producing nations such as Venezuela, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia offer their populations fuel for as little as $0.12 USD per gallon.

While Lagos has one of Africa’s highest concentration of billionaires, the vast majority of the population struggle daily on less than $2.00 USD.

Amid a staggering 47% youth unemployment rate and thousands of annual deaths related to preventable diseases, the IMF has pulled the rug out from under a nation where safe drinking water is a luxury to around 80% of it’s populace.  

Although Nigeria produces 2.4 million barrels of crude oil a day intended for export use, the country struggles with generating sufficient electrical power and maintaining its infrastructure. Ironically enough, less than 6% of bank depositors own 88% of all bank deposits in Nigeria.

Goldman Sachs employees line its domestic government, in addition to the former Vice President of the World Bank, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, who is widely considered by many to be the de facto Prime Minister.

Even after decades of producing lucrative oil exports, Nigeria has failed to maintain it’s own refineries, forcing it to illogically purchase oil imports from other nations. 

Society at large has not benefited from Nigeria’s natural riches, so it comes as no surprise that a severe level of distrust is held towards the government, who claims the fuel subsidy needs to be lifted in order to divert funds towards improving the quality of life within the country.

Like so many other nations, Nigerian people have suffered from a systematically reduced living standard after being subjected to the IMF’s Structural Adjustment Policies (SAP).

Before a loan can be taken from the World Bank or IMF, a country must first follow strict economic policies, which include

1. ·         currency devaluation,
2. ·         lifting of trade tariffs, the
3. ·         removal of subsidies and
4. ·         detrimental budget cuts to critical public sector health and education services.
5. ·         SAPs encourage borrower countries to focus on the production and export of domestic commodities and
6. ·         resources to increase foreign exchange, which can often be subject to dramatic fluctuations in value.
7. ·         Without the protection of price controls and an authentic currency rate, extreme inflation and poverty subsist to the point of civil unrest, as seen in a wide array of countries around the world (usually in former colonial protectorates).
8. The people of Nigeria have been one of the world’s most vocal against IMF-induced austerity measures, student protests have been met with heavy handed repression since 1986 and several times since then, resulting in hundreds of civilian deaths.
9. As a testament to the success of the loan, the average laborer in Nigeria earned 35% more in the 1970’s than he would of in 2012.

Working through the direct representation of Western Financial Institutions and the IMF in Nigeria’s Government, a new IMF conditionality calls for the creation of a Sovereign Wealth Fund.

Olusegun Aganga, the former Nigerian Minister of Finance commented on how the SWF was hastily pushed through and enacted prior to the countries national elections.

If huge savings are amassed from oil exports and austerity measures, one cannot realistically expect that these funds will be invested towards infrastructure development based on the current track record of the Nigerian Government.

Further more, it is increasingly more likely that any proceeds from a SWF would be beneficial to Western institutions and markets, which initially demanded its creation.

Nigerian philanthropist Bukar Usman prophetically writes “I have genuine fears that the SWF would serve us no better than other foreign-recommended "remedies" which we had implemented to our own detriment in the past or are being pushed to implement today.”

The abrupt simultaneous removal of fuel subsidies in several West African nations is a clear indication of who is really in charge of things in post-colonial Africa.

The timing of its cushion-less implementation could not be any worse, Nigeria’s president Goodluck Jonathan recently declared a state of emergency after forty people were killed in a church bombing on Christmas day, an act allegedly committed by the Islamist separatist group, Boko Haram.

The group advocates dividing the predominately Muslim northern states from the Christian southern states, a similar predicament to the recent division of Sudan. 

As the United States African Command (AFRICOM) begins to gain a foothold into the continent with its troops officially present in Eritrea and Uganda in an effort to maintain security and remove other theocratic religious groups such as the Lord’s Resistance Army, the sectarian violence in Nigeria provides a convenient pretext for military intervention in the continuing resource war.

For further insight into this theory, it is interesting to note that United States Army War College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania conducted a series of African war game scenarios in preparation for the Pentagon’s expansion of AFRICOM under the Obama Administration.

In the presence of US State Department Officials, employees from The Rand Corporation and Israeli military personnel, a military exercise was undertaken which tested how AFRICOM would respond to a disintegratingNigeria on the verge of collapse amidst civil war.

The scenario envisioned rebel factions vying for control of the Niger Delta oil fields (the source of one of America’s top oil imports), which would potentially be secured by some 20,000 U.S. troops if a US-friendly coup failed to take place At a press conference at the House Armed Services Committee on March 13, 2008, AFRICOM Commander, General William Ward then went on to brazenly state the priority issue of America’s growing dependence on African oil would be furthered by AFRICOM operating under the principle theatre-goal of “combating terrorism”.

At an AFRICOM Conference held at Fort McNair on February 18, 2008, Vice Admiral Robert T. Moeller openly declared the guiding principle of AFRICOM was to protect “the free flow of natural resources from Africa to the global market”, before citing China’s increasing presence in the region as challenging to American interests.

After the unwarranted snatch-and-grab regime change conducted in Libya, nurturing economic destabilization, civil unrest and sectarian conflict in Nigeria is an ultimately tangible effort to secure Africa’s second largest oil reserves.

During the pillage of Libya, its SFW accounts worth over 1.2 billion USD were frozen and essentially absorbed by Franco-Anglo-American powers;

It would be realistic to assume that much the same would occur if Nigeria failed to comply with Western interests. 

While agents of foreign capital have already infiltrated its government, there is little doubt that Nigeria will become a new front in the War on Terror. 

Nile Bowie is a freelance writer and photojournalist; he's regularly contributed to Tony Cartalucci's Land Destroyer Report and Alex Jones' Infowars. 

Dear Sir, 

The Pentagon is a tool of corporations who always finance both side of a conflict in order to justify "military intervention" to steal other nation's resources. The IMF has a horrific track record which is why their funding has been cut off. 

Comments

[a]

質問

フルフォード氏へ。
あなたはその活動の中でペンタゴンについて言及していますが、この終末の時をめぐる争いの中で、両極の側についている複数のペンタゴン・グループがあるのでしょうか。私は国防長官直属の統合軍について書かれたものを読みました。統合軍とは、例えばラゴスの統治体制においてIMFやゴールドマン・サックスの代表らが原因として発生した不穏な状態を、鎮圧することに関与したUSAFRICACOMのような組織のことです。USAFRICACOMはグローバル・エリートたちのための警察機構のようなものです。加えて息子ブッシュ政権下においてこれらの統合軍が設置されて以来、6つのグローバル統合軍はエリートたちによってコントロールされ、“アメリカ合衆国の安全のための軍事力”という題目を掲げながら肥大化していく、世界規模の軍になっているようです。彼らの使命は地球規模で“テロとの戦い”を遂行していくことです。

さらには我々が皆知るとおり、IMFとはグローバル・エリートたちが小国から富をはき出させるために使う“道具”の一つに過ぎません。以下の記事を読んでみてください。グローバル・エリートたちが西欧諸国政府の後援を得ることで、世界の国々の支配を可能とし、そこに眠る天然資源を略奪してきたことについてこの記事は書いています。またその仕業によって募る西欧社会に対する憎しみと、そしてそれが暴動や戦争にまで発展する可能性についても言及しています。

アフリカで使われていた戦略が、徐々にここ合衆国内でも押しつけられるようになっています。負債のバブルが弾けたとき、大変な量の富がアメリカ国民の懐から収奪されることでしょう。そしてそれが起こるのはもう時間の問題となっています。だからこそアメリカ国民は、エリートたちが世界中の人々から盗んできた富の償還を、法的に請求していく必要があるのです。世界中の人々を絞り上げて富を吸収してきたIMFこそが、真の意味でグローバル・テロリストだと言えるでしょう。自らの指導者がつくり出した負債によって民衆が奴隷化されている現状は、まさに悲劇です。

これはペンタゴン内部の良心的なグループが、自身の統合軍組織と戦っているということでしょうか。

（略）

投稿者様へ。
ペンタゴンは紛争において両サイドをファイナンスし、“軍事介入”を口実に他国の資源を盗み出す企業群の道具です。IMFは身の毛もよだつような実績の数々があるため、彼らの資金提供は現在止められています。

[Rick2012]

The Pentagono is going to war against Iran?If that comes to be true(as there´s war games together with Israel)that shows once again which side the Pentagono is playing the game.And more,it will show the real power of China(and the WDS also)and Russia.

[Otto Lund]

Mr Benjamin Fulford, thank you for all information

Please give my regards to Mr Alexander Romanov, his family managed to boycot the satanistic leage of nations, and had to pay a big price for all of us

Benjamin Fulford & Alexander Romanov - The Illuminati Exposed 2012 http://www.navigate3d.no/mbbs22/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=1663&start=151#M7779

Could you ask Alexander to send a fb-friend request to me: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=698760657 My fb-friend requests are blocked because I've used it too much some days

Thank you, have a nice day. Otto

[Kurt Schilling]

Nukes are banned here and all over this universe. There will be no nukes used - ever. No WW3 - no nukes.