« 学生ドキュメンタリー映画 「911の子どもたちへ」追加上映会のお知らせ | Main | Weekly Geopolitical News and Analysis100405: Have the illuminati been monopolizing ancient technology? »

04/02/2010

Comments

dutchy

Some relevant quotes in this regard and a question; why haven't I heard more about an excellent expose recently by Dylan Ratigan of the MSNBC netwerk in which he takes down the Federal reserve, even comparing Greenspan with the mafia don of the movie the Godfather?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGTHf3eNpp0

QUOTES

"To comprehend this nebula, it is necessary to abandon traditional financial or political logic; this is not merely a question of nation, political party, or of ordinary economics. ... over the last twenty years, the economic powers, some of which mafia types, have allied themselves with political forces and organized criminal structures ... [they reached] Absolute Power."
- Confidential Belgian gendarmerie report to top level officials, November 21, 1994, first translated and published on ISGP.

"This Colonel would have accepted the proposal to leave the MOSSAD and put his entire team at the service of ["Nebula leader"] PRZEDBORSKI. ... This Colonel would have ... trained members of the CONTRAS as well as those of the CALI CARTEL."
- Same report as above, shedding more light on the darkest aspects of the Iran-Contra scandal.

"A clandestine division of the bank called the "black network," which functions as a global intelligence operation and a Mafia-like enforcement squad ... rumors of its activities filtered through the bank's managerial level [and associates] with chilling effectiveness. ... 'Our own people have been staked out or followed, and we suspect tapped telephones,' says a New York law-enforcement officer."
- July 29, 1991, Time Magazine, 'The Dirtiest Bank of All (BCCI)'

"As if by coincidence people die. There is no explanation for their deaths. For instance, they are victims of a deadly traffic accident just when they are under way to testify. Or one finds their charred bodies. Our judiciary apparently doesn't have sleepless nights over this."
- Jean Denis Lejeune, father of one of the girls Dutroux murdered. (ZDF, January 30, 2001) Whoever has seen the names in the police files, can come up with an explanation.

アンビリーブル

4月7日、日本を訪れているアメリカのビルサック農務長官が都内で開かれたアメリカ大使館主催の食糧安全保障国際シンポジウムで講演を行い、「バイオテクノロジーは遺伝子技術の有無にかかわらず、農村地域の貧困解消に寄与する」と述べ、米国が力を入れる遺伝子組み換え技術に対する警戒論をけん制したというニュースがありますが、

遺伝子組み換え技術を用いた食糧援助は過去に旱魃と飢餓に瀕するアフリカのザンビアや
ジンバブエ政府から拒否されたこともあり、彼らが拒否した理由も当時のヨーロッパやアメリカの学者たちの警戒論にならったものだったようです。
http://www.47news.jp/CN/201004/CN2010040701000173.html
http://www2.odn.ne.jp/~cdu37690/afurikagmkyohiameikahoudou.htm

『観光でロンドンを訪れたアメリカ人が、イギリスの新聞の見出しに、遺伝子組み換え食品の危険性が大々的に載っているのをみて、「うちの国には、こういう危険な食品がなくて良かった」とつぶやく、というものだ。
 実はアメリカの食品の6割には、遺伝子組み換え品が原材料の一部として使われているのだが、それがアメリカで問題にならないので、アメリカ人の多くは知らないままだ、という落ちである。 』
という笑い話もあったようです。
http://tanakanews.com/991112GMO.htm

また下の2003年のニュースでは中国の食品製造業者は中国では遺伝子組み換え食品を販売しないと公式に声明しているようです。

食品会社、
中国で販売する製品に遺伝子組み換え原料を使わないと誓約

「2003年7月22日 中国広州、ENS(Environment News Service)の記事より
中国の食品製造業者は、今回初めて、中国では遺伝子組み換え食品を販売しないと公式に声明した。このことはグリーンピース中国が展開したキャンペーンの成果であり、
53の商標名を持つ32の食品会社が、遺伝子組み換え原料を含まない食品のみの販売に合意した。

これら32の食品会社は公式声明書をグリーンピースに送り、その中で、中国国内で販売する食品に遺伝子組み換え原料を使用しないと発表した。」
http://newfarm.rodaleinstitute.org/japan/features/200307/200307054ChinaGM/SJ_ChinaGM.shtml

日本の食品には遺伝子組み換えがどのくらい正確に表示されているのかが以前から気になっています。

なおこ

個人的に急騰な円高を願っています。(短期間でも) どなたかが今年早々60円ぐらいまでドルが下がると言っておられましたが、そこまでは行かないみたいですね。

Luis Magno

From: Luis Magno
To: Miriam
Re: Mike di Cosola's written objection [that's objection, singular]

The infighting has begun. I am uneasy and for now reserve judgment on Mike di Cosola, the human being. Right revolutionary judgment will hopefully swiftly prevail. Spring revolutionary sprouts are everywhere. May the pure in spirit prevail.

Cheers,
Luis Magno

j

Those american tax dollars at work:

http://collateralmurder.com/

Pray for america as she is complicit in this murder and too apathetic and stupid to stop it. We will perish in the next world war unless the people or some one or something stops all this insanity!

Pray for peace to find it's way and the world to forgive us for letting this get way to far out of hand. But then, who or what can stop it all?

とおりすがり

今は抑止。5月に再加速。結論は決まっています。今はつじつまあわせの段階。
終末思想のような個体の生死の選別はないです。
不安がる必要はないです。
普通に生きていきましょう。

Miriam

Not being negative here, just informing:
This is a letter to Sam Kennedy of the Guardians of the Republic concerning The Restore America Plan from the head of the Illinois dejure jury who has had grave misgivings about TRAP.
The link will bring you to a page with other letters and questions several people had.

To get to Mike's scroll almost to the bottom:
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2010/02/the-restore-america-plan-trap.html


from Mike DiCosola
to The Guardian Elders
date Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 6:35 PM
subject IN ANSWER TO YOUR MIRACULOUS ILLINOIS DEVELOPMENTS - THE RESTORE AMERICA PLAN
mailed-by yahoo.com
signed-by yahoo.com

hide details 6:35 PM (13 hours ago)

Hello Sam,

After careful research and deliberation with the assembly members, as the Delegate appointed on the de jure Illinois county assembly, I, Mike Di Cosola, have completed my due diligence and have concluded by way of reasonable doubt, that this method by which to resolve our grievances is not within our lawful rights, remedies and authority. Sam, You have used the word "inducted" within your email to me. Inducted is a word used for Citizens that will be inducted into the Military. Once you are into the military you are classified as an enemy combatant. You have not replied to any of my commentary or have shown any true leadership by way of lawfully appointed authority or even by administrative duty to answer to and account for all questions presented you. I have attempted to ask you to contact me by way of phone as well and to provide your contact phone number but this was to no avail. You are negotiating on behalf of we the People to an authority that has not been revealed to us, yet you have never been given such authority by the People to do such a thing. It is to our understanding that you have not been acting in the form of your lawful birth right name. The aka name that you have is not the birth right name you have been given. Please explain if this bit of information is accurate?

You, nor any of the Elders have signed their name on the declaration and you have used an aka name for your name of choice. We are expected to sign blindly to the declaration after you have clearly shown by way of written statement via email, that our questions are a delusional waste of time? The Elders have not signed their name on this document first and that is a tall tail for concern. I have heard you on your first call answer someone that asked you if the military has been giving you instructions and you told her no. She then asked you if they have read the document and you said no, why would we ask the military to read the document if it is not ready? It will look as though we are not ready for the republic. Now you email me stating that you are under obligations to ensure that the process moves forward expediently. Who are you obligated to? Who have you ensured? You state that you are currently in negotiations when I was told by Tim that the declaration was final. What are you still negotiating? Who gave you the authority to do such a thing on behalf of we the people?

You mock the fact that I ask a question such as the meaning to the use of the word "North America" in the guardian oath. Even Tim Turner's documents for a secured party creditor have definitions which describe each word in order to make a clear understanding as to the meaning of the words used in the security agreement between the principal secured party and the straw man. Are you telling me that the most important document of this generations life does not require such a thing?

There is case law that will support the concerns we have which is listed below. Although I believe the declaration has good points of redress and orders, the method is in error and has several holes of interpretation that can be converted to color of law for years to come from our renown Nemesis, the BAR ASSOCIATION and members thereof. You call us Guardians. "Guardians" are persons(corporation) charged with the duty of taking care of the person and managing the property and rights of another person, who, for defect of age, understanding, or self-control, is considered incapable of administering his own affairs. So first we are complaining that we have others managing our affairs and now we are going to manage others affairs as a corporate fiction? We jumped from one frying pan into another.

You call yourselves Elders. Since you do not have a definitions page and we are now forced to be the first to interpret the words of this document, here is the definitions we can conclude your words to mean. Elders can mean either "elders title" which applies to who has the highest authority that prevails. Or it can mean "Elders brethren" elected masters of Trinity House or as full title of the corporation would call it "Elder Brethren of the Holy and Undivided Trinity" which is charged with duties of the marine(maritime/admiralty).

"Trinity House" in English law, is a society at Deptford Strond, incorporated by Hen. VIII in 1515, for the promotion of commerce and navigation by licensing and regulating pilots and ordering and erecting beacons, lighthouses, buoys, etc.

"Trinity Masters" are defined as Elder Brethren of the Trinity House. If a question arising in an admiralty action depends upon technical skill and experience in navigation, the judge or court is usually assisted at the hearing by two Trinity Masters who sit as assessors, and advise the court on questions of a nautical character. Sounds like attorneys to me. Who advises the court right now? We have all heard of the term "I will take that under advisement". What has changed?

"Trinity Setting" is defined as Sittings of the English court of appeal and of the high court of justice in London and Middle-sex, commencing on the Tuesday after Whitsun week, and terminating on the 8th of August. One of the four divisions of the English legal year. See also Easter, Hilary, Michaelmas sittings. Rules of the Supreme Court 1965. The divisions were formerly called terms until the Judicature Act of 1873. Now if you look up the Supreme Court Act of 1981, you will see that the Crown Courts are considered the High courts or Queens Bench, and the high courts are considered any Circuit court or Recorder. This means that all Judge or justice of the piece from a Municipal court and/or Court of Appeal, with or without a chancellor division, are considered under the jurisdiction of the Crown Court and Queen.

A "Grand Jury" is based on a jury of inquiry who find bills of indictment in cases where they are satisfied a trial ought to be had. They are sworn and instructed(doesn't seem we have any power here, does it?) with duties to determine whether probable cause exists that a crime has been committed and whether an indictment (True Bill) should be returned against one for such crime. This is a commercial transaction again which holds no authority of discretion in favor of the jury once so ever. As compared to a common law trial by jury of your peers.

If you would have received the vote of the National Assemblies on this document, you would have only needed fifty signatures, which are one from each Delegate or one for each de jure organic state, Republic. Instead, you need 26 from each state and you are giving us a take it or leave it ultimatum. Please review case law below:


Case from 1937 299 U.S. 353 or 81 L Addition 278.(This is a case that shows an unlawful assembly) Look it up. Then look up the difference between that case and the case in 1876 - Cruikshank 92 U.S. 542 (this is the case that shows a lawful assembly) We and I, do not and will not move forward, with this method of redress and grievance. Although we will continue to find resolve by way of lawful and rightful vacancy of our de jure offices, reserved for us by way of the constitution and blue printed for us by way of lawful and peaceful assembly, we will not be a part of a hostile corporate takeover against a Federal Municipal Corporation and become classified as an enemy combatant. We will trigger the Trading With the Enemy Act and the Patriot Act and will have a one way ticket to FEMA. I pray that whatever you and yours decide, God watches over you and your families from the possible ramifications that will follow in this feudal attempt for delusional(as you would put it) justice. As the appointed Delegate on the organic de jure Illinois, Republic, I must decline the position of coordinator and decline the position and duties of such solicitation(as Sam called it). If it is interpreted that I have already taken a position of coordinator, it was done so without full disclosure and all presumed powers of attorney, duties, responsibilities and or actions are hereby revoked by me, I, Mike Di Cosola. I wish to not be a part of this act and nor does the lawful Illinois county assembly as per their instructions. If you wish to proceed you must do so without our lawful Illinois county assembly supporting your actions.

As for the email that you just sent that has both unfounded accusations and a defamation of both Deborah(the sweatest lady) and my character and credibility, it is the only sign that I needed, when asking in my prayers that God help us stay informed so we may know in our hearts that our final decisions are of God's will, self thought, wisdom and nature.

You have threatened that people on high places will take the documents that have never been withheld from me. So if something should happen to me, everyone should know where to go to find the perpetrator and instigator. The emails that I have sent you are well documented with straight forward questions and have been shared and consulted with all members of the assembly. There has never been a hold up on the process that we have been diligently moving forward on with respect to the signatures. There are many states that have backed out of your deceptive plan and there are also many states that have not yet achieved all the signatures required. What is most interesting is that you have elected to create a smear campaign against the man and the state (Illinois, Republic) that has been supporting this cause of a de jure free republic from day one. I know you are up to no good simply because you are imposable to get a hold of, you go by an alias name and you don't feel you need to answer any of my questions, using old and obvious tactics such as associating a born American that is from Italian decent with skinheads, Nazis, and members of the Aryan Nation. The old tail waging the dog trick. Since you have decided to make false accusations, create controversy and lash out at Deborah and I, I know also know your intentions are nothing but deceitful.

What makes you feel that World War III would be established if the signatures were not completed?What do you know that you are not telling us?

You state that I have provided documents to provocateurs who distributed them nationwide as part of a coordinated black ops campaign to scuttle your remedy. Your imagination has taken over you common sense. You are an experienced actor who is a writer and broadcast show host. I am an American that is lawful, God fearing, delegate of the Illinois county assembly and I believe that there are many who would support my reputation. You know nothing about me but yet you use words like Black ops and provocateurs to slander me. All the while ignoring all the questions with answers that are not transparent. Are these lashes of defamation just a reflection of who you really are?

Additionally, you have stated that a Wisconsin man by the name of Robert Steven McMinn will be taking over the signatures for Illinois. Who gives you the authority to make such appointment for a different state and usurp on to our jurisdiction our rights and remedies when there is already an assembly that can speak for themselves and appoint for themselves? Are you already showing your dictatorship? I have stuck my neck out for Robert McMinn in court and under several situations of State conflicts between him and his personal cases. Now you send the very man I have helped, to take over without lawful authority, the lawful de jure of the Illinois county assembly?

Your true colors are gleaming with deception and dictatorship. Just because you now finally disclose to everyone that you are getting power of attorney from their signatures, you feel as though this relieves you of not disclosing to all that signed that this was exactly what they are doing? You tell them to "do your homework" as an answer for the request for a definitions page, instead of giving them definitions to make sure there is a transparency? You really do feel we are all as ignorant as your replies.

You spell my name both ways since I make full knowledge to the world what my name is and use both the birth name and the shortened name to describe it. What is your real name Sam? I believe I know it as well as several other people. Why are you not disclosing it?"

What makes me grieve is that there are so many good people with God given talents and peaceful, lawful, holy, intentions wanting to join your cause with good intentions. I will pray that they are all protected from your deceptive practices, but as the bible states, "Those who have eyes will not see." and as you of all people know, "A house divided will fall". First Kelly now me. You just keep breaking up the patriot community through misinformation don't you.

In conclusion, no one will stop anyone in Illinois from signing your documents. It is their right to do so. I have been informed by the Illinois county assembly though, that if you replace me without their authority or not answer their questions as requested, they will be revoking their signatures and they will not participate in your deception. Since you have decided to do just that, I have been informed to tell you their wishes.

P.S. You use Tim Turners name as the first name on this email blasted out to the patriot community, it is amazing that Tim had time to draft this document and put his name on it since he is currently in Arizona holding a seminar. The people are smart enough to figure out your smoke and mirrors.

Respectfully and Regretfully,

Mike Di Cosola

abcd

香港の李氏2名がビルダーバーグ新会員になったといううわさがあるが
これは闇の連中が今後、中国を北京ではなく香港からコントロールしよう
としているのではと推測される。

多分、連中のストーリーは以下の様なものじゃないかと思われる。

1.世界で唯一、中国の砂漠に植林しようなどと考える日本人を国家ごと崩壊させる。
2.中国が国家機密としている毒物付着黄砂問題、公害問題を拡大し中国人、アジア人を大量死させる。
3.中国共産党に全ての責任を被せ共産党政権を抹殺する。
4.その後、救世主のように香港政権を誕生させる。
(これにてまったく手を汚さず金もかけず中国支配完了。)

以上の様なストーリー展開じゃないかと感じる。

Claudia Treacy

For Mark:

As one of the "jurors" of the RAP, I know I can speak for others in our republic. We would like to receive your candid updates. Is there anyway we might be informed? Our local "leadership" purposely in not forthcoming with information. We are currently receiving updates from other coordinators.

I really appreciate your message. If Benjamin is able to provide you with my email address, I give him my permission.

oftheoz

One will never be pulled down to HELL if ones only vision, heart desire and deliberate intention is reaching out to heaven.

A sovereign entity is eternally free, empowered. Awareness is essential, fear is defeat while Death is nothing but an illusion.

It is an illusion that the "enemy", "evil ones" is out there to get us regardless. It is a greater illusion that an "ordinary" individual is "powerless"to create a reality of ones desire. What the external manifestation is the collective internal thought form, vision, fear.

To transform darkness, each one has to become light.

oftheoz

Thanks Mark for sharing. Love will be send to all who is bringing/holding light to our world to end the darkness. Light is here, may walter shield himself with love and fear falls away...


影三界の使者

16を暗示するものの役割が終わりを告げ、昨今の時事ニュースとして12が動き出している様子がうかがい知れるだろう。2013年6月6日までには十二白獣が召集され、13が白日の下に曝されたらいよいよ覚悟が必要になる。「道理」は矛盾や欺瞞で誤魔化せないと今頃気付いても愚か者には道連れしか選択肢が無い。道連れは「終末論」を流布するものの常套手段であり、神託や預言などの類である筈も無く、恐怖を煽り自作自演の道連れによる「終末論」を自ら演じているだけの事である。自ら蒔いた種は自らが収穫されよ「道理」の監視者は13の出現と共に「元道理」を行なうであろう。

sakusaku

昨年からベンジャミンさんが指摘していた、平沼新党が結成されましたが。
石原都知事、中曽根元総理、ナベツネなんて老害の連中。特に中曽根なんぞ欧米の闇勢力につながる魑魅魍魎にごあいさつとは一体どういうこと?

信頼できるのでしょうか?特に与謝野さんは。

Luis Magno

I don't have time for ETs

A new world order is emerging from the ground up. It replaces the now dominant 300-yr old world order centered in the monetary and financial districts of London and New York. We identify the top oligarch and out him. We identify him ethno-racially and out him socio-politically. No oligarch in the chain of command is exempt. European Americans have historical and cultural priorities and preferences that take precedence over alien postulations and indigenous barbarisms. If that is clear then let the revolution begin!

Con vivencia y derecho,
Luis Magno
luis_magno@q.com
http://spanishamericans.webs.com/

LR

http://divinecosmos.com/index.php/start-here/transcripts/519-david-wilcock-on-coast-to-coast-am-october-6-2009

Spread love and hope, especially love...

Luis Magno

I don't have time for ETs

A new world order is emerging from the ground up. It replaces the now dominant 300-yr old world order centered in the monetary and financial districts of London and New York. We identify the top oligarch and out him. We identify him ethno-racially and out him socio-politically. No oligarch in the chain of command is exempt. European Americans have historical and cultural priorities and preferences that take precedence over alien postulations and indigenous barbarisms. If that is clear then let the revolution begin!

Con vivencia y derecho,
Luis Magno
luis_magno@q.com
http://spanishamericans.webs.com/


...---...



rense.com

Why Hiroshima Was Destroyed
The Detailed History Of An Infamous Era
By Eustace C. Mullins
4-4-10

A very popular movie in Japan was Pride, The Fateful Moment, which shows Prime Minister General Hideki Tojo in a favorable light. With six others, he was hanged in 1968 as a war criminal. During his trial, his lawyers stated to the International Tribunal for the Far East, the Asian version of Nuremberg Trials, that Tojo's war crimes could not begin to approach the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The prosecutors immediately objected, and censored their statements. That was the last time there was any official recognition of the atomic bomb massacres in Japan. Japanese officials have been effectively prevented from taking any stand on this matter because the American military occupation, which officially ended in 1952 with the Treaty with Japan, was quietly continued. Today, 49,000 American troops are still stationed in Japan, and there is no public discussion of the crimes of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Cast of Characters

The House of Rothschild; international bankers who made enormous profits during the nineteenth century, and used their money to take over governments.

Bernard Baruch: New York agent of the Rothschilds who at the turn of the century set up the tobacco trust, the copper trust and other trusts for the Rothschilds. He became the grey eminence of the United States atomic bomb program when his lackey, J. Robert Oppenheimner, became director of the Los Alamos bomb development, and when his Washington lackey, James F. Byrnes, advised Truman to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Albert Einstein; lifelong Zionist who initiated the United States' atomic bomb program with a personal letter to President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1939.



The Secret History Of The Atomic Bomb

SUBTITLE Why Hiroshima Was Destroyed - The Untold Story

By Eustace C. Mullins

June 1998

The world was stunned to learn that India has now tested nuclear weapons. For many years, all nations have been concerned about the proliferation of atomic explosives. Even in their distress, no one seems to be interested in the historic or the psychological record of why these weapons were developed, and what special breed of mankind devoted themselves to this diabolical goal.

Despite the lack of public interest, the record is clear, and easily available to anyone who is interested. My interest in this subject, dormant for many years was suddenly rekindled during my annual lecture tour in Japan. My hosts had taken me to the city of Nagasaki for the first time. Without telling me their plans, they entered the Nagasaki Atomic Bomb Museum. I thought it would be an interesting experience, but, to my surprise, when I walked into the exhibition rooms, I was suddenly overcome by sadness. Realizing that I was about to burst into tears, I moved away from my companions, and stood biting my lip. Even so, it seemed impossible to control myself. I was surrounded by the most gruesome objects, the fingers of a human hand fused with glass, a photograph of the shadow of a man on a brick wall; the man had been vaporized in the explosion .

A NEW MISSION

When I returned to the United States, I knew1 had to unearth the sinister figures behind greatest of human catastrophes. It took many weeks of research to uncover what turned out to be the most far-reaching conspiracy of all time, the program of a few dedicated revolutionaries to seize control of the entire world, by inventing the powerful weapon ever unveiled.

The story begins in Germany. In the 1930s, Germany and Japan had a number of scientists icing on the development of nuclear fission. In both of these countries, their leaders sternly forbade them to continue their research. Adolf Hitler said he would never allow anyone in Germany to work to work on such an inhumane weapon.

The Emperor of Japan let his scientists know that he would never approve such a weapon. At that time the United States had no one working on nuclear fission. The disgruntled German scientists contacted friends in the United States, and were told that there was a possibility of government support for their work here. As Don Beyer tells these immigrants to the United States pushed their program.

"Leo Szilard, together with his long time friends and fellow Hungarian physicists, Eugene Wigner and Edward Teller, agreed that the President must be warned; fission bomb tehnology was not so farfetched. The Jewish emigres, now living in America, had personal experience of fascism in Europe. In 1939, the three physicists enlisted the support of Albert Einstein, letter dated August 2 signed by Einstein was delivered by Alexander Sachs to Franklin D. Roosevelt at the White House on October 11, 39."

CRIMINALS ON DISPLAY

At the Nagasaki Atomic Bomb Museum, photographs of two men are prominently displayed; Albert Einstein, and J. Robert Oppenheimer, who developed the atomic bomb at Los Alamos laboratories, New Mexico. Also on display is a statement from General Eisenhower, who was then supreme Military Commander, which is found in number of books about Eisenhower, and which can be found on p.426, Eisenhower by Stephen E. Ambrose, Simon & Shuster, NY, 1983.

"Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson first told Eisenhower of the bomb's existence. Eisenhower was engulfed by "a feeling of depression'. When Stimson said the United States proposed to use the bomb against Japan, Eisenhower voiced 'my grave misgivings, first on the basis of my belief that Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary, and secondly because I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion by the use (of atomic weapons).' Stimson was upset by Eisenhower's attitude 'almost angrily refuting the reasons I gave for my quick conclusion'. Three days later, Eisenhower flew to Berlin, where he met with Truman and his principal advisors. Again Eisenhower recommended against using the bomb, and again was ignored.

Other books on Eisenhower state that he endangered his career by his protests against the bomb, which the conspirators in the highest level of the United States government had already sworn to use against Japan, regardless of any military developments. Eisenhower could not have known that Stimson was a prominent member of Skull and Bones at Yale, the Brotherhood of Death, founded by the Russell Trust in 1848 as a bunch of the German Illuminati, or that they had played prominent roles in organizing wars and revolutions since that time. Nor could he have known that President Truman had only had one job in his career, as a Masonic organizer for the State of Missouri, and that the lodges he built up later sent him to the United States Senate and then to the presidency.

ATOMIC TERRORISM

The man who set all this in motion was Albert Einstein, who left Europe and came to the United States in October 1933. His wife said that he "regarded human beings with detestation". He had previously corresponded with Sigmund Freud about his projects of "peace" and "disarmament", although Freud later said he did not believe that Einstein ever accepted any of his theories. Einstein had a personal interest in Freud's work because his son Eduard spent his life in mental institutions, undergoing both insulin therapy and electroshock treatment, none of which produced any change in his condition.

When Einstien arrived in the United States, he was feted as a famous scientist, and was invited to the White House by President and Mrs. Roosevelt. He was soon deeply involved with Eleanor Roosevelt in her many leftwing causes, in which Einstein heartily concurred. Some of Einstein's biographers hail the modern era as "the Einstein Revolution" and "the Age of Einstein", possibly because he set in motion the program of nuclear fission in the United States. His letter to Roosevelt requesting that the government inaugurate an atomic bomb program was obviously stirred by his lifelong commitment to "peace and disarmament". His actual commitment was to Zionism; Ronald W. Clark mentions in Einstein; His Life And Times, Avon, 1971, p.377, "He would campaign with the Zionists for a Jewish homeland in Palestine." On p.460, Clark quotes Einstein, "As a Jew I am from today a supporter of the Jewish Zionist efforts." (1919) Einstein's letter to Roosevelt, dated august 2, 1939, was delivered personally to President Roosevelt by Alexander Sachs on October 11. Why did Einstein enlist an intermediary to bring this letter to Roosevelt, with whom he was on friendly terms? The atomic bomb program could not be launched without the necessary Wall Street sponsorship. Sachs, a Russian Jew, listed his profession as "economist" but was actually a bagman for the Rothschilds, who regularly delivered large sums of cash to Roosevelt in the White House. Sachs was an advisor to Eugene Meyer of the Lazard Freres International Banking House, and also with Lehman Brothers, another well known banker. Sachs' delivery of the Einstein letter to the White House let Roosevelt know that the Rothschilds approved of the project and wished him to go full speed ahead.

A UNITED NATIONS PROJECT

In May of 1945, the architects of postwar strategy, or, as they liked to call themselves, the "Masters of the Universe", gathered in San Francisco at the plush Palace Hotel to write the Charter for the United Nations. Several of the principals retired for a private meeting in the exclusive Garden Room. The head of the United States delegation had called this secret meeting with his top aide, Alger Hiss, representing the president of the United States and the Soviet KGB; John Foster Dulles, of the Wall Street law firm of Sullivan and Cromwell, whose mentor, William Nelson Cromwell, had been called a "professional revolutionary" on the floor of Congress; and W. Averill Harriman, plenipotentiary extraordinary, who had spent the last two years in Moscow directing Stalin's war for survival. These four men represented the awesome power of the American Republic in world affairs, yet of the four, only Secretary of State Edward Stettinius Jr., had a position authorized by the Constitution. Stettinius called the meeting to order to discuss an urgent matter; the Japanese were already privately suing for peace, which presented a grave crisis. The atomic bomb would not be ready for several more months. "We have already lost Germany," Stettinius said. "If Japan bows out, we will not have a live population on which to test the bomb."

"But, Mr. Secretary," said Alger Hiss, "no one can ignore the terrible power of this weapon." "Nevertheless," said Stettinius, "our entire postwar program depends on terrifying the world with the atomic bomb." "To accomplish that goal," said John Foster Dulles, "you will need a very good tally. I should say a million." "Yes," replied Stettinius, "we are hoping for a million tally in Japan. But if they surrender, we won't have anything." "Then you have to keep them in the war until the bomb is ready," said John Foster Dulles. "That is no problem. Unconditional surrender." "They won't agree to that," said Stettinius. "They are sworn to protect the Emperor." "Exactly," said John Foster Dulles. "Keep Japan in the war another three months, and we can use the bomb on their cities; we will end this war with the naked fear of all the peoples of the world, who will then bow to our will."

Edward Stettinius Jr. was the son of a J.P. Morgan partner who had been the world's largest munitions dealer in the First World War. He had been named by J.P. Morgan to oversee all purchases of munitions by both France and England in the United States throughout the war. John Foster Dulles was also an accomplished warmonger. In 1933, he and his brother Allen had rushed to Cologne to meet with Adolf Hitler and guaranteed him the funds to maintain the Nazi regime. The Dulles brothers were representing their clients, Kuhn Loeb Co., and the Rothschilds. Alger Hiss was the golden prince of the communist elite in the united States. When he was chosen as head of the prestigious Carnegie Endowment for International Peace after World War II, his nomination was seconded by John Foster Dulles. Hiss was later sent to prison for perjury for lying about his exploits as a Soviet espionage agent.

This secret meeting in the Garden Room was actually the first military strategy session of the United Nations, because it was dedicated to its mission of exploding the world's first atomic weapon on a living population. It also forecast the entire strategy of the Cold War, which lasted forty-three years, cost American taxpayers five trillion dollars, and accomplished exactly nothing, as it was intended to do. Thus we see that the New World Order has based its entire strategy on the agony of the hundreds of thousands of civilians burned alive at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, including many thousands of children sitting in their schoolrooms. These leaders had learned from their master, Josef Stalin, that no one can rule without mass terrorism, which in turn required mass murder. As Senator Vandenberg, leader of the Republican loyal opposition, was to say (as quoted in American Heritage magazine, August 1977), "We have got to scare the hell out of "em."

THE JEWISH HELL-BOMB

The atomic bomb was developed at the Los Alamos Laboratories in New Mexico. The top secret project was called the Manhattan Project, because its secret director, Bernard Baruch, lived in Manhattan, as did many of the other principals. Baruch had chosen Maj. Gen. Leslie R. Groves to head the operation. He had previously built the Pentagon, and had a good reputation among the Washington politicians, who usually came when Baruch beckoned.

The scientific director at Los Alamos was J. Robert Oppenheimer, scion of a prosperous family of clothing merchants. In Oppenheimer; the Years Of Risk, by James Kunetka, Prentice Hall, NY, 1982, Kunetka writes, p. 106, "Baruch was especially interested in Oppenheimer for the position of senior scientific adviser." The project cost an estimated two billion dollars. No other nation in the world could have afforded to develop such a bomb. The first successful test of the atomic bomb occurred at the Trinity site, two hundred miles south of Los Alamos at 5:29:45 a.m. on July 16, 1945.

Oppenheimer was beside himself at the spectacle. He shrieked, "I am become Death, the Destroyer of worlds." Indeed, this seemed to be the ultimate goal of the Manhattan Project, to destroy the world. There had been considerable fear among the scientists that the test explosion might indeed set off a chain reaction, which would destroy the entire world. Oppenheimer's exultation came from his realization that now his people had attained the ultimate power, through which they could implement their five-thousand-year desire to rule the entire world.

THE BUCK PASSES TO TRUMAN

Although Truman liked to take full credit for the decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan, in fact, he was advised by a prestigious group, The National Defense Research Committee, consisting of George L. Harrison, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York; Dr. James B. Conant, president of Harvard, who had spent the First World War developing more effective poison gases, and who in 1942 had been commissioned by Winston Churchill to develop an Anthrax bomb to be used on Germany, which would have killed every living thing in Germany. Conant was unable to perfect the bomb before Germany surrendered, otherwise he would have had another line to add to his resume. His service on Truman's Committee which advised him to drop the atomic bomb on Japan, added to his previous record as a chemical warfare professional, allowed me to describe him in papers filed before the United States Court of Claims in 1957, as "the most notorious war criminal of the Second World War". As Gauleiter of Germany after the war, he had ordered the burning of my book, The Federal Reserve Conspiracy, ten thousand copies having been published in Oberammergau, the site of the world-famed Passion Play.

Also on the committee were Dr. Karl Compton, and James F. Byrnes, acting Secretary of State. For thirty years, Byrnes had been known as Bernard Baruch's man in Washington. With his Wall Street profits, Baruch had built the most lavish estate in South Carolina, which he named Hobcaw Barony. As the wealthiest man in South Carolina, this epitome of the carpet-bagger also controlled the political purse strings. Now Baruch was in a position to dictate to Truman, through his man Byrnes, that he should drop the atomic bomb on Japan.

LIPMAN SIEW

Despite the fact that the Manhattan Project was the most closely guarded secret of World War II, one man, and one many only, was allowed to observe everything and to know everything about the project. He was Lipman Siew, a Lithuanian Jew who had come to the United States as a political refugee at the age of seventeen. He lived in Boston on Lawrence St., and decided to take the name of William L. Laurence. At Harvard, he became a close friend of James B. Conant and was tutored by him. When Laurence went to New York, he was hired by Herbert Bayard Swope, editor of the New York World, who was known as Bernard Baruch's personal publicity agent. Baruch owned the World. In 1930, Laurence accepted an offer from the New York Times to become its science editor. He states in Who's Who that he "was selected by the heads of the atomic bomb project as sole writer and public relations." How one could be a public relations writer for a top secret project was not explained. Laurence was the only civilian present at the historic explosion of the test bomb on July 16, 1945. Less than a month later, he sat in the copilots seat of the B-29 on the fateful Nagasaki bombing run.

WILL JAPAN SURRENDER BEFORE THE BOMB IS DROPPED?

There were still many anxious moments for the conspirators, who planned to launch a new reign of terror throughout the world. Japan had been suing for peace. Each day it seemed less likely that she could stay in the war. On March 9 and 10, 1945, 325 B-29s had burned thirty-five square miles of Tokyo, leaving more than one hundred thousand Japanese dead in the ensuing firestorm. Of Japan's 66 biggest cities, 59 had been mostly destroyed. 178 square miles of urban dwellings had been burned, 500,000 died in the fires, and now twenty million Japanese were homeless. Only four cities had not been destroyed; Hiroshima, Kokura, Niigata, and Nagasaki. Their inhabitants had no inkling that they had been saved as target cities for the experimental atomic bomb. Maj. Gen. Leslie Groves, at Bernard Baruch's insistence, had demanded that Kyoto be the initial target of the bomb. Secretary of War Stimson objected, saying that as the ancient capital of Japan, the city of Kyoto had hundreds of historic wooden temples, and no military targets. The Jews wanted to destroy it precisely because of its great cultural importance to the Japanese people.

THE HORROR OF HIROSHIMA

While the residents of Hiroshima continued to watch the B-29s fly overhead without dropping bombs on them, they had no inkling of the terrible fate which the scientists had reserved for them. William Manchester quotes General Douglas MacArtbur in American Caesar, Little Brown, 1978, p.437

[quoting:] There was another Japan, and MacArthur was one of the few Americans who suspected its existence. He kept urging the Pentagon and the State Department to be alert for conciliatory gestures. The General predicted that the break would come from Tokyo, not the Japanese army. The General was right. A dovish coalition was forming in the Japanese capital, and it was headed by Hirohito himself, who had concluded in the spring of 1945 that a negotiated peace was the only way to end his nation's agony. Beginning in early May, a six-man council of Japanese diplomats explored ways to accommodate the Allies. The delegates informed top military officials that "our resistance is finished". [End quoting]

On p.359, Gar Alperowitz quotes Brig. Gen. Carter W. Clarke, in charge of preparing the MAGIC summary in 1945, who stated in a 1959 historical interview, "We brought them down to an abject surrender through the accelerated sinking of their merchant marine and hunger alone, and when we didn't need to do it, and knew we didn't need to do it, we used them as an experiment for two atomic bombs."

Although President Truman referred to himself as the sole authority in the decision to drop the bomb, in fact he was totally influenced by Bernard Baruch's man in Washington, James F. Byrnes. Gar Alperowitz states, p. 196, "Byrnes spoke with the authority of-personally represented-the president of the United States on all bomb-related matters in the Interim Committee's deliberations." David McCullough, in his laudatory biography of Truman, which was described as "a valentine", admitted that "Truman didn't know his own Secretary of State, Stettinius. He had no background in foreign policy, no expert advisors of his own."

The tragedy of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was that a weak, inexperienced president, completely under the influence of Byrnes and Baruch, allowed himself to be manipulated into perpetrating a terrible massacre. In the introduction to Hiroshima's Shadows, we find that "Truman was moving in quite the opposite direction, largely under the influence of Byrnes. The atom bomb for Byrnes was an instrument of diplomacy-atomic diplomacy." (p.ix)

MASS MURDER

On August 6, 1945, a uranium bomb 3-235, 20 kilotons yield, was exploded 1850 feet in the air above Hiroshima, for maximum explosive effect. It devastated four square miles, and killed 140,000 of the 255,000 inhabitants. In Hiroshima's Shadows, we find a statement by a doctor who treated some of the victims; p.415, Dr. Shuntaro Hida: "It was strange to us that Hiroshima had never been bombed, despite the fact that B-29 bombers flew over the city every day. Only after the war did I come to know that Hiroshima, according to American archives, had been kept untouched in order to preserve it as a target for the use of nuclear weapons. Perhaps, if the American administration and its military authorities had paid sufficient regard to the terrible nature of the fiery demon which mankind had discovered and yet knew so little about its consequences, the American authorities might never have used such a weapon against the 750,000 Japanese who ultimately became its victims."

Dr. Hida says that while treating the terribly mangled and burned victims, "My eyes were ready to overflow with tears. I spoke to myself and bit my lip so that I would not cry. If I had cried, I would have lost my courage to keep standing and working, treating dying victims of Hiroshima."

On p.433, Hiroshima's Shadows, Kensaburo Oe declares, "From the instant the atomic bomb exploded, it became the symbol of all human evil; it was a savagely primitive demon and most modern curse.... My nightmare stems from a suspicion that a 'certain trust in human strength' or 'humanism' flashed across the minds of American intellectuals who decided upon the project that concluded with the dropping of the bomb on Hiroshima."

In the introduction to Hiroshima's Shadows, we find that "One of the myths of Hiroshima is that the inhabitants were warned by leaflets that an atomic bomb would be dropped. The leaflets Leonard Nadler and William P. Jones recall seeing in the Hiroshima Museum in 1960 and 1970 were dropped after the bombing. This happened because the President's Interim Committee on the Atomic Bomb decided on May 31 'that we could not give the Japanese any warning'. Furthermore, the decision to drop 'atomic' leaflets on Japanese cities was not made until August 7, the day after the Hiroshima bombing. They were not dropped until August 10, after Nagasaki had been bombed. We can say that the residents of Hiroshima received no advance warning about the use of the atomic bomb. On June 1, 1945, a formal and official decision was taken during a meeting of the so-called Interim Committee not to warn the populations of the specific target cities. James Byrnes and Oppenheimer insisted that the bombs must be used without prior warning."

"Closely linked to the question of whether a warning of an atomic bomb attack was given to the civilian populations of the target cities is the third 'article of fifth' that underpins the American legend of Hiroshima; the belief that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were military targets. The Headquarters of the Japanese Second army were located in Hiroshima and approximately 20,000 men-of which about half, or 10,000 died in the attack. In Nagasaki, there were about 150 deaths among military personnel in the city. Thus, between the two cities, 4.4% of the total death toll was made up of military personnel. In short, more than 95% of the casualties were civilians."

On p.39 of Hiroshima's Shadows we find that (at Hiroshima) "strictly military damage was insignificant." How are we to reconcile this statement with Harry Truman's vainglorious boast in Off The Record; the Private Papers of Harry S. Truman Harper, 1980, p.304, "In 1945 I had ordered the Atomic Bomb dropped on Japan at two places devoted almost exclusively to war production." In fact, many thousands of the Hiroshima casualties were children sitting in their classrooms.

The bomb was dropped because (p.35) "The Manhattan Project's managers were lobbying to use the atomic bomb. Byrnes sat in on these meetings. Maj. Gen. Groves seems to have been the author of the claim that the use of the bomb would save a million American lives--a figure in the realm of fantasy."

Truman himself variously stated that the use of the use of the atomic bomb saved "a quarter of a million American lives", a "half-million American lives", and finally settled on the Gen. Groves figure of "a million American lives saved."

Meanwhile (p.64) William L. Laurence, who was writing for the New York Times at full salary while also receiving a full salary from the War Department as the "public relations agent for the atomic bomb" published several stories in the New York Times denying that there had been any radiation effects on the victims of the Hiroshima bombing (Sept. 5, 1945 et seq.) in which he quotes General Groves' indignant comment, "The Japanese are still continuing their propaganda aimed at creating the impression we won the war unfairly and thus attempting to create sympathy for themselves."

(p.66) "The Legation of Switzerland on August 11, 1945 forwarded from Tokyo the following memorandum to the State Department (which sat on it for twenty-five years before finally releasing it): 'The Legation of Switzerland has received a communication from the Japanese Government.' On August 6, 1945, American airplanes released on the residential district of the town of Hiroshima, bombs of a new type, killing and injuring in one second a large number of civilians and destroying a great part of the town. Not only is the city of Hiroshima a provincial town without any protection or special military installations of any kind, but also none of the neighboring regions or towns constitutes a military objective."

The introduction to Hiroshima's Shadows concludes that (p.lxvii) "The claim that an invasion of the Japanese home islands was necessary without the use of the atomic bombs is untrue. The claim that an 'atomic warning' was given to the populace of Hiroshima is untrue. And the claim that both cities were key military targets is untrue."

A PILOT'S STORY

Corroboration of these statements is found in the remarkable record of Ellsworth Torrey Carrington, "Reflections of a Hiroshima Pilot", (p.9) "As part of the Hiroshima atomic battle plan my B-29 (named Jabbitt III, Captain John Abbott Wilson's third war plane) flew the weather observation mission over the secondary target of Kokura on August 6, 1945." (p. 10) "After the first bomb was dropped, the atom bomb command was very fearful that Japan might surrender before we could drop the second bomb, so our people worked around the clock, 24-hours-a-day to avoid such a misfortune." This is, of course, satire on Carrington's part. (p. 13) "in city after city all over the face of Japan (except for our cities spared because reserved for atomic holocaust) they ignited the most terrible firestorms in history with very light losses (of B-29s). Sometimes the heat from these firestorms was so intense that later waves of B-29s were caught by updrafts strong enough to loft them upwards from 4 or 5,000 feet all the way up to 8 or 10,000 feet. The major told us that the fire-bombing of Japan had proven successful far beyond anything they had imagined possible and that the 20th Air Force was running out of cities to burn. Already there were no longer (as of the first week in June 1945) any target cities left that were worth the attention of more than 50 B-29s, and on a big day, we could send up as many as 450 planes!" "The totality of the devastation in Japan was extraordinary, and this was matched by the near-totality of Japan's defencelessness." (as of June 1, 1945, before the atomic bombs were dropped.) (p. 14) "The Truman government censored and controlled all the war information that was allowed to reach the public, and of course, Truman had a vested interest in obscuring the truth so as to surreptitiously prolong the war and be politically able to use the atom bomb. Regarding the second element of the Roosevelt-Truman atomic Cold War strategy of deceiving the public into believing that Japan was still militarily viable in the spring and summer of 1945, the centerpiece was the terribly expensive and criminally unnecessary campaign against Okinawa.

Carrington quotes Admiral William D. Leahy, p. 245, I Was There, McGraw Hill: "A large part of the Japanese Navy was already on the bottom of the sea. The combined Navy surface and air force action even by this time had forced Japan into a position that made her early surrender inevitable. None of us then knew the potentialities of the atomic bomb, but it was my opinion, and I urged it strongly on the Joint Chiefs, that no major land invasion of the Japanese mainland was necessary to win the war. The JCS did order the preparation of plans for an invasion, but the invasion itself was never authorized."

Thus Truman, urged on by General Groves, claims that "a million American lives were saved" by the use of the atomic bomb, when no invasion had ever been authorized, and was not in the cards. Carrington continues, p. 16, "The monstrous truth is that the timing of the Okinawa campaign was exclusively related to the early August timetable of the atomic bomb. J'accuse! I accuse Presidents Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman of deliberately committing war crimes against the American people for the sole purpose of helping set the stage for the criminally unnecessary use of atomic weapons on Japan."

Carrington further quotes Admiral Leahy, from I Was There, "It is my opinion that the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagaski was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the successful bombing with conventional weapons."

Carrington concludes, p.22, "Truman's wanton use of atomic weapons left the American people feeling dramatically less secure after winning World War II than they had ever felt before, and these feelings of insecurity have been exploited by unscrupulous Cold War Machine Politicians ever since." As Senator Vandenberg said, "We have to scare the hell out of 'em" in order to browbeat the American people into paying heavy taxes to support the Cold War.

DID THE ATOMIC BOMB WIN THE WAR AGAINST JAPAN?

Admiral William Leahy also stated in I Was There, "My own feeling is that being the first to use it (the atomic bomb) we had adopted an ethical standard common to the Barbarism of the Dark Ages. I was not taught to make war in that fashion, and wars cannot be won by destroying women and children."

Gar Alperowitz notes, p. 16, "On May 5, May 12 and June 7, the Office of Strategic Services (our intelligence operation), reported Japan was considering capitulation. Further messages came on May 18, July 7, July 13 and July 16."

Alperowitz points out, p.36, "The standing United States demand for 'unconditional surrender' directly threatened not only the person of the Emperor but such central tenets of Japanese culture as well."

Alperowitz also quotes General Curtis LeMay, chief of the Air Forces, p.334, "The war would have been over in two weeks without the Russians entering and without the atomic bomb. PRESS INQUIRY: You mean that, sir? Without the Russians and without the atomic bomb? LeMay: The atomic bomb had nothing to do with the end of the war at all." September 29, 1945, statement.

THE NAGASAKI BOMB

When the Air Force dropped the atomic bomb on Nagasaki, with William Laurence riding in the co-pilot's seat of the B-29, pretending to be Dr. Strangelove, here again the principal target was a Catholic church. P.93, The Fall Of Japan, by William Craig, Dial, NY, 1967, "the roof and masonry of the Catholic cathedral fell on the kneeling worshippers. All of them died." This church has now been rebuilt, and is a prominent feature of the Nagasaki tour.

After the terror bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the victorious Allies moved promptly to try Japanese officials for their "war crimes". From 1945-51 several thousand Japanese military men were found guilty of war crimes by an International Military Tribunal which met in Tokyo from 1946 to 1948. Twenty-eight Japanese military and civilian leaders were accused of having engaged in conspiracy to commit atrocities. The dissenting member of the Tokyo tribunal, Judge Radhabinod of India, dismissed the charge that Japanese leaders had conspired to commit atrocities, stating that a stronger case might be made against the victors, because the decision to use the atomic bomb resulted in indiscriminate murder.

A very popular movie in Japan today is Pride, The Fateful Moment, which shows Prime Minister General Hideki Tojo in a favorable light. With six others, he was hanged in 1968 as a war criminal. During his trial, his lawyers stated to the International Tribunal for the Far East, the Asian version of Nuremberg Trials, that Tojo's war crimes could not begin to approach the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The prosecutors immediately objected, and censored their statements. That was the last time there was any official recognition of the atomic bomb massacres in Japan. Japanese officials have been effectively prevented from taking any stand on this matter because the American military occupation, which officially ended in 1952 with the Treaty with Japan, was quietly continued. Today, 49,000 American troops are still stationed in Japan, and there is no public discussion of the crimes of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

AMERICAN MILITARY AUTHORITIES SAY ATOMIC BOMB UNNECESSARY

The most authoritative Air Force unit during World War II was the U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey, which selected targets on the basis of need, and which analyzed the results for future missions. In Hiroshima's Shadow, the U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey report of July 1, 1946 states, "The Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombs did not defeat Japan, nor by the testimony of the enemy leaders who ended the war did they persuade Japan to accept unconditional surrender. The Emperor, the lord privy seal, the prime minister, the foreign minister, and the navy minister had decided as early as May 1945 that the war should be ended even if it meant acceptance of defeat on allied terms.... It is the Survey's opinion that certainly prior to December 1, 1945 and in all probability prior to November 1, 1945, Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped and even if no invasion had been planned or contemplated."

Both military, political and religious leaders spoke out against the atomic bombing of Japanese civilians. The Federal Council of the Churches of Christ in America issued a formal statement in March 1946 (cited by Gar Alperowitz):

"The surprise bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are morally indefensible. Both bombings must be judged to have been unnecessary for winning the war. As the power that first used the atomic bomb under these circumstances, we have sinned grievously against the laws of God and against the people of Japan."-Commission on the Relation of the Church to the War in the Light of the Christian Faith.

On p.438, Gar Alperowitz quotes James M. Gillis, editor of Catholic World, "I would call it a crime were it not that the word 'crime' implies sin, and sin requires a consciousness of guilt. The action taken by the Untied States government was in defiance of every sentiment and every conviction upon which our civilization is based."

One of the most vociferous critics of the atomic bombings was David Lawrence, founder and editor of U.S. News and World Report. He signed a number of stinging editorials, the first on August 17, 1945.

"Military necessity will be our constant cry in answer to criticism, but it will never erase from our minds the simple truth, that we, of all civilized nations, though hesitating to use poison gas, did not hesitate to employ the most destructive weapon of all times indiscriminately against men, women and children." On October 5, Lawrence continued his attack, "The United States should be the first to condemn the atomic bomb and apologize for its use against Japan. Spokesmen for the Army Air Forces said it wasn't necessary and that the war had been won already. Competent testimony exists to prove that Japan was seeking to surrender many weeks before the atomic bomb came." On November 23, Lawrence wrote, "The truth is we are guilty. Our conscience as a nation must trouble us. We must confess our sin. We have used a horrible weapon to asphyxiate and cremate more than 100,000 men, women and children in a sort of super-lethal gas chamber- and all this in a war already won or which spokesman for our Air Forces tell us we could have readily won without the atomic bomb. We ought, therefore, to apologize in unequivocal terms at once to the whole world for our misuse of the atomic bomb."

David Lawrence was an avowed conservative, a successful businessman, who knew eleven presidents of the United States intimately, and was awarded the Medal of Freedom by President Richard M. Nixon, April 22, 1970.

ANOTHER EISENHOWER SPEAKS

Although Eisenhower never changed his opinion of the use of the atomic bomb, during his presidency he repeatedly voiced his opinion, as quoted by Steve Neal, The Eisenhowers Doubleday, 1978. P.225, "Ike would never lose his scepticism of the weapon and later referred to it as a 'hellish contrivance'."

His brother, Milton Eisenhower, a prominent educator, was even more vocal on this subject. As quoted by Gar Alperwitz, p.358, Milton Eisenhower said, "Our employment of this new force at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a supreme provocation to other nations, especially the Soviet Union. Moreover, its use violated the normal standards of warfare by wiping out entire populations, mostly civilians, in the target cities. Certainly what happened at Hiroshima and Nagasaki will forever be on the conscience of the American people."

During his Presidency, Dwight Eisenhower tried to find peaceful uses for atomic energy. In The Eisenhower Diaries, p.261, we find that "The phrase 'atoms for peace' entered the lexicon of international affairs with a speech by Eisenhower before the United Nations December 8, 1953." Control of atomic energy had now given the New World Order clique enormous power, and Eisenhower, in his farewell speech to the American people on leaving the Presidency In Review (Doubleday, 1969), on January 17, 1961, warned, "In the councils of government we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the miliary-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist."

By failing to name the power behind the military-industrial complex, the international bankers, Eisenhower left the American people in the dark as to he was actually warning them against. To this day they do not understand what he was trying to say, that the international bankers, the Zionists and the Freemasons had formed an unholy alliance whose money and power could not be overcome by righteous citizens of the United States.

MACARTHUR'S WARNING

General Douglas MacArthur also tried to warn the American people of this threat, as quoted in American Ceaser, by William Manchester, Little Brown, 1978, p.692, "In 1957, he lashed out at large Pentagon budgets. 'Our government has kept us in a perpetual state of fear-kept us in a continuous stampede of patriotic fervor-with the cry of grave national emergency. Always there has been some terrible evil to gobble us up if we did not blindly rally behind it by furnishing the exorbitant funds demanded. Yet, in retrospect, these disasters seem never to have happened, seem never to have been quite real."

This was the restatement of Senator Vandenberg's famous comment, "We have to scare the hell out of 'em."

THE NEW ATOMIC AGE

The scientists who had built the atomic bomb were gleeful when they received the news of its success at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In the book, Robert Oppenheimer, Dark Prince, by Jack Rummel, 1992, we find, p.96, "Back in the United States the news of the bombing of Hiroshima was greeted with a mixture of relief, pride, joy, shock and sadness. Otto Frisch remembers the shouts of joy, 'Hiroshima has been destroyed!' 'Many of my friends were rushing to the telephone to book tables at the La Fonda Hotel in Santa Fe in order to celebrate. Oppenheimer walked around "like a prizefighter, clasping his hands together above his head as he came to the podium".'"

Oppenheimer had been a lifelong Communist. "He was heavily influenced by Soviet Communism ": A New Civilization, by Sidney and Beatrice Webb, the founders of Fabian Socialism in England. He became director of research at the newly formed U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, with his mentor, Bernard Baruch, serving as chairman. Oppenheimer continued his many Communist Party Associations; his wife was Kitty Peuning, widow of Joe Dallet, an American Communist who had been killed defending Communism with the notorious Lincoln Brigade in Spain. Because Oppenheimer was under Party discipline, the Party then ordered him to marry Kitty Peuning and make a home for her.

Baruch resigned from the Atomic Energy Commission to attend to his business interests. He was replaced by Lewis Lichtenstein Strauss, of Kuhn, Loeb Co. Strauss was apprised of Oppenheimer's many Communist associations, but he decided to overlook them until he found that Oppenheimer was sabotaging progress on developing the new and much more destructive hydrogen bomb. It seemed apparent that Oppenheimer was delaying the hydrogen bomb until the Soviet Union could get its own version on line. Furious at the betrayal, he asked Oppenheimer to resign as director of the Commission. Oppenheimer refused. Strauss then ordered that he be tried. A hearing was held from April 5 to May 6, 1954. After reviewing the results, the Atomic Energy Commission voted to strip Oppenheimer of his security clearance, ruling that he "possessed substantial defects of character and imprudent dangerous associations with known subversives".

Oppenheimer retired to Princeton, where his mentor, Albert Einstein, presided over the Institute for Advanced Study, a think tank for refugee "geniuses", financed by the Rothschilds through one of their many secret foundations. Oppenheimer was already a trustee of the Institute, were he remained until his death in 1966.

THE REBIRTH OF ISRAEL

Einstein considered the atomic age merely as a stage for the rebirth of Israel. On p.760 of Einstein; His Life And Times we find that Abba Eban, the Israeli Ambassador, came to his home with the Israeli consul, Reuben Dafni. He later wrote, "Professor Einstein told me that he saw the rebirth of Israel as one of the few political acts in his lifetime which had an essential moral quality. He believed that the conscience of the world should, therefore, be involved in Israel's preservation." by Ronald W. Clarke, Avon Books 1971.

On March 1, 1946, Army Air Force Contract No. MX-791 was signed, creating the RAND Corporation as an official think tank, defining Project RAND as "a continuing program of scientific study and research on the broad subject of air warfare with the object of recommending to the Air Force preferred methods of techniques and instrumentalities for this purpose." On May 14, 1948, RAND Corporation funding was taken over by H. Rowan Gaither, head of the Ford Foundation. This was done because the Air Force had sole control of the atomic bomb, RAND Corp. developed the Air Force and atomic bomb program for the Cold War, with the Strategic Air Command, the missile program, and many other elements of the "terror strategy". It became a billion dollar game for these scientists, with John von Neumann, their leading scientist, becoming world famous as the inventor of "game theory", in which the United States and the Soviet Union engaged in a worldwide "game" to see which would be the first to attack the other with nuclear missiles. In the United States, the schools held daily bomb drills, with the children hiding under their desks. No one told them that thousands of schools children in Hiroshima had been incinerated in their classrooms; the desks offered no protection against nuclear weapons. The moral effect on the children was devastating. If they were to be vaporized in the next ten seconds, there seemed little reason to study, marry and have children, or prepare for a steady job. This demoralization through the nuclear weapons program is the undisclosed reason for the decline in public morality.

In 1987, Phyllis LaFarge published The Strangelove Legacy, The Impact Of The Nuclear Threat On Children, chronicling through extended research the moral devastation wreaked on the children by the daily threat of annihilation. She quotes Freeman Dyson, who stated the world has been divided into two worlds, the world of the warriors, and the world of the victims, the children. It was William L. Laurence, sitting in the co-pilot's seat of a B-29 over Nagasaki, and the children waiting to be vaporized below. This situation has not changed.

THE LEGAL ASPECTS OF NUCLEAR WARFARE

Because Japan was occupied by the U.S. Military in 1945, the Japanese Government was never allowed any opportunity to file any legal charges about the use of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Although Japanese leaders were tried and executed for "war crimes" no one was ever charged for the atomic bombings. It was not until 1996 that the World Court delivered an opinion on the use of nuclear weapons, (p.565, Hiroshima's Shadows) "In July 1996, the World court took a stand in its first formal opinion on the legality of nuclear weapons. Two years earlier, the United Nations had asked the Court for an advisory opinion. The General Assembly of the United Nations posed a single, yet profoundly basic, question for consideration. It the threat of use of nuclear weapons on any circumstances permitted under international law? For the first time, the world's pre-eminent judicial authority has considered the question of criminality vis-a-vis the use of a nuclear weapon, and, in doing so, it has come to the conclusion that the use of a nuclear weapon is 'unlawful'. It is also the Court's view that even the threat of the use of a nuclear weapon is illegal. Although there were differences concerning the implications of the right of self-defense provided by Article 51 of the U.N. Charter, ten of the fourteen judges hearing the case found the use of threat to use a nuclear weapon to be illegal on the basis of the existing canon of humanitarian law which governs the conduct of armed conflict. The judges based their opinion on more than a century of treatise and conventions that are collectively known as the 'Hague' and 'Geneva' laws."

Thus the Court ruled that nuclear weapons are illegal under the Hague and Geneva conventions , agreements which were in existence at the time of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings. They were illegal then, and they are illegal now.

GANDHI SPEAKS

Among world leaders who spoke out about the United States' use of atomic weapons in Japan, Mahatma Gandhi echoed the general climate of opinion. P.258, Hiroshima's Shadow: "The atomic bomb has deadened the finest feelings which have sustained mankind for ages. There used to be so-called laws of war which made it tolerable. Now we understand the naked truth. War knows no law except that of might. The atomic bomb brought an empty victory to the Allied armies. It has resulted for the time being in the soul of Japan being destroyed. What has happened to the soul of the destroying nation is yet too early to see. Truth needs to be repeated as long as there are men who do not believe it."

BIBLIOGRAPHY:

The Private Lives Of Albert Einstein, by Roger Highfield, St. Martins Press, NY, 1993.

The Wizards Of Armageddon, by Fred Kaplan, Simon & Shuster, NY, 1993.

Albert Einstein, by Milton Dank, Franklin Watts, 1983.

Off The Record; The Private Papers Of Harry S. Truman, Harper & Row, 1980.

The Eisenhowers, by Steve Neal, Doubleday, 1978.

The Eisenhower Diaries, W.W. Norton, 1981.

In Review, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Doubleday, 1969.

Eisenhower, Stephen E. Ambrose, Simon & Schuster, 1983.

The Strangelove Legacy, Phyllis LaFarge, Harper & Row, 1987.

Einstein, His Life & Times, Ronald W. Clark, Avon books, 1971.

Robert Oppenheimer, Dark Prince, by Jack Rummel, 1992.

The Manhattan Project, by Don E. Beyer, Franklin Wat, 1991.

The Great Decision, The Secret History Of The Atomic Bomb, Michael Amrine, Putnams, NY, 1959.

Eisenhower At War, by David Eisenhower, Random House, NY, 1986.

The Fall Of Japan, by William Craig, Dial, NY, 1967.

Oppenheimer, The Years Of Risk, Jas W. Kunetka, Prentice Hall, 1982.

Target Tokyo, Gordon W. Prange, McGraw Hill, 1984.

Hiroshima's Shadow, edited by Kai Bird, Pamphleteer Press, 1998.

The Decision To Use The Atomic Bomb, by Gar Alperowitz, Knopf, NY, 1995.

Was Einstein Right? by Clifford M. Will, Basic Books, 1986.

THE COURT OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE

Eustace C. Mullins, Ezra Pound World Peace Foundation Japanese-American Friendship Society and the People of Japan,

Plaintiffs,

The United States Government, Defendant.

The plaintiffs bring this action before the World Court of International Justice to resolve the following charges:

1. Defendant conspired to commit war crimes against the people of Japan during World War II.

2. Defendant conspired to commit atrocities against the people of Japan during World War II.

3. Defendant conspired to subsequently evade and cover up these crimes by militarily occupying the nation of Japan, effectively preventing the people of Japan from seeking legal recourse for the actions of defendant. Defendant continues to militarily occupy Japan today, with 49,999 troops stationed there, on the pretext that the Soviet Union might attack. This pretext ignores the geopolitical fact that the Soviet Union collapsed in 1989 and does not pose a threat to anyone.

4. Defendant conspired to commit crimes of genocide against the people of Japan, motivated by racial hatred and religious bigotry.

5. Defendant violated the Hague agreements and the Geneva Convention, as determined by the World Court in June 1996, by making war against civilians and inflicting millions of casualties by firebombing Japanese cities and the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II.

6. After committing these crimes, defendant conspired to cover up these crimes by issuing a number of false statements, denying war crimes, and distortions of fact to evade any punishment for these war crimes.

7. Defendant also conspired to conceal from the American people the circumstances behind the commission of these war crimes, that a small group of conspirators, refugees from Europe, came to the United States and infiltrated the government of the United States, and in total secrecy launched the project to manufacture an atomic bomb for use against Germany and Japan. At no time during this conspiracy were the people of the United States aware of what was taking place, nor consulted for their approval, in violation of republican'principles and the Constitution of the United States.

8. Since World War II, defendant has conducted a worldwide program of atomic terrorism, called atomic diplomacy, to ensure that its program continues unabated, and without punishment.

9. Although Japan had been reduced to ashes by June 1945, defendant insisted that an invasion was necessary, while ignoring peace tenders from Japan since May 1945, and defendant further claimed that the American military would suffer one million war dead while invading Japan, and that it was necessary to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima, August 6, 1945, and Nagasaki, August 9, 1945. In fact, as Admiral William D. Leahy pointed out in his book, I Was There, "the invasion itself was never authorized." General Dwight D. Eisenhower, Supreme Military Commander, Admiral William D. Leahy, Air force General Curtis LeMay, and many other American military leaders, made public statements that it was not necessary to drop the atomic bombs. Political considerations dictated that it be dropped on Japan, in order to test it on a living population, and, if possible, to "tally" a million or more victims with the bombs, for the purpose of postwar intimidation of all other nations.

10. The atomic bomb was the creation of a small group of European refugees, whose efforts to develop such a bomb in Europe had been indignantly rejected. Albert Einstein, the physicist, wrote a personal letter to President Franklin D. Roosevelt, August 2, 1939, recommending that this bomb be built by the United States. His letter was hand-delivered to Roosevelt by Alexander Sachs, a Wall Street speculator. The atomic bomb program was directed from behind the scenes by another Wall Street speculator, Bernard Baruch, an agent of the Rothschilds. Baruch selected Major General Leslie Groves as the director of the project, and J. Robert Oppenheimer as science director of the program. Baruch continued to issue directives throughout the program, insisting to Major General Groves that the city of Kyoto be the primary target of the atomic bombs. Military leaders opposed this selection, pointing out that Kyoto was the ancient capital of Japan, and a religious center with more than two hundred ancient temples. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were finally chosen, although neither of these cities offered a primary military target. Baruch continued to dictate decisions on the atomic bomb, through the President's National Defense Research Committee, chaired by Baruch's Washington representative, James F. Byrnes.

11. After the devastation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, defendant perpetrated a number of outright falsehoods to avoid blame for these massacres of civilians. The first was that the inhabitants were warned by leaflets dropped over the city that an atomic bomb would be used. In fact, the leaflets were not dropped until August 10, after the bombs had exploded. The President's Committee had resolved on May 31, 1945 that "we could not give the Japanese any warning." The second falsehood was that an invasion of Japan would be necessary if the atomic bomb was not used; this would cost a million American lives. Many leading American military authorities state this is absolutely false. The third falsehood was that both cities were "key military targets". President Truman boasted in his private papers that "in 1945 I had ordered the atomic bomb dropped on Japan at two places devoted almost exclusively to war production."

In fact, more than 95% of the dead at Hiroshima and Nagasaki were civilians. Only 4.4% of the death toll was made up of military personnel. A fourth falsehood, printed in the New York Times September 5, 1945, was that the victims had suffered no radiation damage. This story was written by William L. Laurence, the paid propagandist for the War Department with exclusive rights to material on the atomic bomb. Laurence quoted Major General Groves that the Japanese "are attempting to create sympathy for themselves".

12. The Legation of Switzerland in Tokyo forwarded to the defendant a statement from the Japanese government, the complaint that "the city of Hiroshima is a provincial town without any protection or military installations of any kind, but also none of the neighboring regions or towns constitutes a military objective." Observers on the scene recorded that "strictly military damage was insignificant."

13. The most authoritative official United States unit during World War II was the U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey, which selected targets and analyzed the results of the bombings for the benefit of future missions. Their report of July 1, 1946 states, "the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs did not defeat Japan, nor by the testimony of the enemy leaders who ended the war did they persuade Japan to accept unconditional surrender. The Emperor, the lord privy seal, the prime minister, the foreign minister, and the navy minister had decided as early as May 1945 that the war should be ended even if it meant acceptance of defeat on allied terms... It is the Survey's opinion that certainly prior to December 1, 1945, and in all probability prior to November 1, 1945, Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped and even if no invasion had been planned or contemplated."

14. This proves that the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were war crimes deliberately committed, with foreknowledge that it was not necessary to drop the atomic bombs on these two cities. As David Lawrence, founder and editor of U.S. News And World Report, wrote in his editorial November 23, 1945, "the truth is we are guilty. Our conscience as a nation must trouble us. We must confess our sin. We have used a horrible weapon to asphyxiate and cremate more than 100,000 men, women and children in a sort of super-lethal gas chamber--and all this in a war already won or which spokesman for our Air Forces tell us we could have readily won without the atomic bomb."

15. The world leader and pacifist Mahatma Gandhi spoke sadly about the tragedy of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. "The atomic bomb has deadened the finest feelings which have sustained mankind for ages. There used to be so-called laws of war which made it tolerable. Now we understand the naked truth. War knows no law except that of might. The atomic bomb brought an empty victory to the Allied armies. It has resulted for the time being in the soul of Japan being destroyed. What has happened to the soul of the destroying nation is yet too early to see."

16. Defendant is in violation of the Geneva Convention. Protocol 2, Scope of Application of Humanitarian Law, states: 1. "International humanitarian law is applicable to international armed conflicts. The international law of peace existing between the states concerned will thus be large superseded by the rules of international humanitarian law.... A state can not, therefore, be allowed to invoke military necessity as a justification for upsetting that balance by departing from those rules."

17. IV. Humanitarian Requirements and Military Necessity. "In war, a belligerent many apply only that amount and kind of force necessary to defeat the enemy. Acts of war are only permissible if they are directed against military objectives, if they are not likely to cause unnecessary suffering, and if they are not perfidious." The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki clearly falls outside the scope of this ruling, being civilian targets, the bombing caused unnecessary suffering, and defendant's attempted justification was openly perfidious.

18. 129. If an act of war is not expressly prohibited by international agreements or customary law, this does not necessarily mean that it is actually permissible. The so-called Martens Clause, developed by the Livonian professor Friedrich von Martens (1845-1909) delegate of Tsar Nicholas II at the Hague Peace Conferences, which has been included in the Preamble to the 1907 Hague Convention IV and reaffirmed in the 1977 Additional Protocal I as stated below, will always be applicable. In cases not covered by the Protocol or by other international agreement, civilians and combatants remain under the protection and authority of the principles of international law derived from established custom, from the principles of humanity, and from the dictates of public conscience. (Artl., pars. 2 AP 1; see also Preamble pars. 4 AP II)

19. Protocol I-Part IV. Section i. "....the obligation of the Parties to the conflict to 'at all times distinguish between the civilian population and combatants'." Article 48-Basic rule, "the prohibition of 'indiscriminate attacks'." Article 51-Protection of the civilian population, paragraph 4, in particular "an attack by bombardment by any method or means which treats as a single military objective a number of clearly separated and distinct military objectives, located in a city, town, village or other area containing a similar concentration of civilians or civilian objects" (Article 51-Protection of the civilian population paragraph 5 (a) and "an attack which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated (article 51-Protection of the civilian population, paragraph 5 [b]).

20. Protocal I-Part IV, Section 1. "Protection of civilians from arbitrary and oppressive enemy action, outlined in 1899, and later in 1907, was expressed in its most complete form in the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949, which is now supplemented by this Protocol.

WHEREFORE, the plaintiffs respectfully move this Court to hear these charges of conspiracy to commit war crimes and atrocities, conspiracy to cover up their crimes, motivated by racial hatred and religious bigotry, and having intimidated the government of Japan and prevented them from seeking any redress for these crimes, and by defendant's ongoing program of atomic terrorism, perfidious falsehoods, and their continuing conspiracy to cover up crimes of genocide, mass murder and undue suffering among their victims, and that the Court shall hear these charges, decide upon appropriate damages, and punishment for the offenders.

Respectfully submitted,

Eustace C. Mullins


abcd

郵便銀行の最大の預金者である年寄りは戦争中の戦時国債の大発行とその後の預金封鎖、大規模インフレを知っている。多分、外国人子供手当て等でゆうちょが危険と判断し解約が相次ぐと思われる。(現在窓口が解約老人で混雑しているという見に行く予定。)
ゆうちょの信頼性=政府の信頼性=現行民主党政権の信頼性であり近いうちにJALのように崩壊すると思われる。
財源が乏しい政権は年金に手をつけると発表すると考えられるがこの場合さらに解約が加速し、ゆうちょが完全崩壊すると思う。

Account Deleted

I think that these Luciferians have something up their sleeve.
2010: The Beginning of the Real Crisis
http://standeyo.com/NEWS/10_Prophecy/100321.2010.prophecies.html
The 'rogue race' might be going after the children. See #10
http://standeyo.com/NEWS/10_Prophecy/100321.prophecy.for.2010.html
Dead Babies and Commander Skeletor
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_denver02.htm#Part%20Four%20-%20Dead%20Babies%20and%20Commander%20Skeletor

BillQuigley

They do not need an excuse to start WWIII
If they could start it tomorow, they would.The more time they have, the more damage they do

TexAnne

Obama was reported by various sorces (google "obama afghanistan trip") as visiting Afghanistan under cover of darkness, so he was at least in Asia this past week.

Gauran

Sorcha Faal I believe to be dis-info

David Burton

One of the most salient things in this world of lies and deceit is skepticism. It is good to start seeing more of it in your posts.

"a lot of panicky maneuvering behind the scenes these days with multiple sources trying to feed the Black Dragon Society with information that cannot be verified." Fine. Don't believe anything that cannot be verified, and even them be cautious. Much is at stake. We don't want any mistakes.

"a group claiming they have already restored the US to constitutional law and that the states have taken back their rights." This is so blatantly a lie that it shouldn't even have been considered plausible. For openers, had the states taken back their rights, we would see a wholesale and orderly departure of the entire US Senate as unconstitutionally constituted since the Seventeenth Amendment was never ratified correctly. In fact one of the greater lies is that all the amendments to the US Constitution past the 12th are invalid and therefore whole bodies of law derived there from are also invalid.

What this has always boiled down to is about money and who controls it and what those who have had control have done with it while they had it. To most of us their record is abysmal. They have much blood on their hands, at least a few hundred millions of innocent people. Their shenanigans have in one way or another prefigured in every major war since at least the reign of Elizabeth I of England. It could be argued their influence extends back much farther.

What is on the line is the exposure of their secret policies and the deeds that resulted as well as the tremendous profit they made for themselves. The rest of the world is sickened to great anger about it at the moment. Some say we want revenge, but what we really want is justice.

As for any so called World government, these bastards insist they are the ones to run it and we say they are completely mistaken. We want none of them to rule over us, ever! Most of us are not yet content to relinquish our unique national sovereignties and feel that, on the ground, there are more than enough ways for ordinary peoples of the various nations to find ways to get along well with each other. We do not need the coercion of any who would consider themselves overlords in any sense.

"Then, we are hearing Obama was summoned to China for a secret, emergency trip. Two separate news sources linked to Naval Intelligence (“Sorcha Faal”) and a source some people tell me is a front for Dick Cheney (Casper) both say this took place. We will try to verify this soon."

Good as both these sources are compromised and represent "their" agenda which includes DELAY, obfuscation, half truth, out and out lie, DELAY, provocation, frighten, terrify, try to cause a market action or reaction, stomp on the gold price by stomping on euro futures based on the likelihood of a Greek default, since they are victims of some NWO types who deliberately stole their economy, MORE DELAY, etc. You can check all that out, I'm sure you'll find the truth in it.

Check out also the fact that these pernicious rectal grievances are busily pestering credit card debtors without jobs while they refuse to cough up the money they owe others. Why? Because they have no money and should have gone bankrupt in 2008 and their officers gone to jail or the gallows! Talk about pissed off?!!! Watch what happens this summer when the market tanks (to around 6,500 on the Dow) and unemployment hits an unofficial 30% here, with all this unfunded health care mandate (which is driving quite a few doctors out of practice), of these scoundrels screwing people because their own grandiose plans for world dominance failed. Surely this puts a death knell to any idea that central planning has any other objective than to enrich and empower a certain select few, who as usual never ever deserved it since THEY ARE THE USELESS EATERS. We the people, who are so often carelessly referred to as "the masses" by these chisellers and weasels are about to yank their claims on humanity from them. The whole curtain of secrecy over Western civilization will and must come down, for the good of all of humanity.

"I know people are running out of patience but we are dealing with very dangerous, mentally sick individuals and we must continue to avoid giving them an excuse to start WW3." That depends on whether WE manage to get THEM before they can try and start a war (it takes WE THE PEOPLE to decide to honor their orders or turn and arrest them!), and Ben, nobody on the ground needs or wants a war. Only THEY want war.

As for the curtain of secrecy spoken of above, what, we wonder, when it comes down, will the Chinese then make of their own choice of a political system to copy from the West, one invented by these same monsters, for their use in running the whole planet? The object being for THEY to rule and the rest to be their slaves. Will China perhaps embark on a slightly abridged (perhaps greatly abridged) version for their future? Perhaps they have done already. We can view this as a salient for the life of the planet.

But first a little justice and it had better come soon.

michael

Casper= Friendly Ghost= Spook?(CIA)

Ain't nothing spookier than Cheney. Well maybe Kissinger or Brezinski.

Faal who is supposed to be in tight with the Russians, sure ignored the latest subway bombings and gave us instead "Watch out for EMPs"????

What a world.

Listened to the "Free the Republic" audio. Hope the 5 governors got served by the Provost Marshalls. Would be nice to see the Armed Forces finally following the Oaths!

rick

http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2008/barton/barton2008a.html

http://divinecosmos.com/images/stories/barton_pentagon.jpg

The comments to this entry are closed.