« 日本の売国奴お爺さん達はまた色々と企んでいる | Main | 国連、世界銀行、IMFとEUの崩壊が近い »



Account Deleted

Hello Mr. Benjamin fulford

This is a Korean historian who investigates the real history.
The history which we have learned at the school was fundamantally distorted.
All history of the world has been manipulated by the barbarian faction of Western Europe.
Originally, Korea and China was one contry, that is, the center of Korea was called for the China. China was never the name of contry, but it means the center of contry.
Beijing was situated at Turpan county of Xinjiang state of China. But the fabricator about history devided one country into two countries, that is, Korea and China.
In the 19th century, Korean language was used at the Chinese continent. And Mandarin was used only at the government by the official not by the common people.
Also the eastern part of China was the sea.
The map of shoreline is below.
In this map, the blue line is a shoreline.

And Japan was situate at Fujiansheng 福建省 [fú jiàn shěng] of China.

We want to find out the more evidence, but it is difficult.
Personnaly, I doubt that maybe the ETs have made an earthly faction distort the real history.

Mr. Benjamin fulford, if you get the real data about the Asian history, please expose it in public.

Lee Taesoo.


Emissions trading is another CDS created by bankers agent.
Woman Who Invented Credit Default Swaps is One of the Key Architects of Carbon Derivatives, Which Would Be at the Very CENTER of Cap and Trade

As I have previously shown, speculative derivatives (especially credit default swaps or "CDS") are a primary cause of the economic crisis. They were largely responsible for bringing down Bear Stearns, AIG (and see this), WaMu and other mammoth corporations.
According to top experts, risky derivatives were not only largely responsible for bringing down the American (and world) economy, but they still pose a substantial systemic risk:
• A Nobel prize-winning economist (George Akerlof) predicted in 1993 that CDS would cause the next meltdown
• Warren Buffett called them “weapons of mass destruction” in 2003
• Warren Buffett’s sidekick Charles T. Munger, has called the CDS prohibition the best solution, and said “it isn’t as though the economic world didn’t function quite well without it, and it isn’t as though what has happened has been so wonderfully desirable that we should logically want more of it”
• Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan - after being one of their biggest cheerleaders - now says CDS are dangerous
• Former SEC chairman Christopher Cox said "The virtually unregulated over-the-counter market in credit-default swaps has played a significant role in the credit crisis''
• Newsweek called CDS "The Monster that Ate Wall Street"
• President Obama said in a June 17 speech on his plans for finance industry regulatory reform that credit swaps and other derivatives “have threatened the entire financial system”
• George Soros says the market is still unsafe, and that credit- default swaps are “toxic” and “a very dangerous derivative” because it’s easier and potentially more profitable for investors to bet against companies using them than through so-called short sales.
• U.S. Congresswoman Maxine Waters introduced a bill in July that tried to ban credit-default swaps because she said they permitted speculation responsible for bringing the financial system to its knees.
• Nobel prize-winning economist Myron Scholes - who developed much of the pricing structure used in CDS - said that over-the-counter CDS are so dangerous that they should be “blown up or burned”, and we should start fresh
• A leading credit default swap expert (Satyajit Das) says that the new credit default swap regulations not only won't help stabilize the economy, they might actually help to destabilize it.
• Senator Cantwell says that the new derivatives legislation is weaker than current regulation
Round Two: Carbon Derivatives
Now, Bloomberg notes that the carbon trading scheme will be largely centered around derivatives:
The banks are preparing to do with carbon what they’ve done before: design and market derivatives contracts that will help client companies hedge their price risk over the long term. They’re also ready to sell carbon-related financial products to outside investors.
[Blythe] Masters says banks must be allowed to lead the way if a mandatory carbon-trading system is going to help save the planet at the lowest possible cost. And derivatives related to carbon must be part of the mix, she says. Derivatives are securities whose value is derived from the value of an underlying commodity -- in this case, CO2 and other greenhouse gases...
Who is Blythe Masters?
She is the JP Morgan employee who invented credit default swaps, and is now heading JPM's carbon trading efforts. As Bloomberg notes (this and all remaining quotes are from the above-linked Bloomberg article):
Masters, 40, oversees the New York bank’s environmental businesses as the firm’s global head of commodities...
As a young London banker in the early 1990s, Masters was part of JPMorgan’s team developing ideas for transferring risk to third parties. She went on to manage credit risk for JPMorgan’s investment bank.
Among the credit derivatives that grew from the bank’s early efforts was the credit-default swap.
Some in congress are fighting against carbon derivatives:
“People are going to be cutting up carbon futures, and we’ll be in trouble,” says Maria Cantwell, a Democratic senator from Washington state. “You can’t stay ahead of the next tool they’re going to create.”
Cantwell, 51, proposed in November that U.S. state governments be given the right to ban unregulated financial products. “The derivatives market has done so much damage to our economy and is nothing more than a very-high-stakes casino -- except that casinos have to abide by regulations,” she wrote in a press release...
However, Congress may cave in to industry pressure to let carbon derivatives trade over-the-counter:
The House cap-and-trade bill bans OTC derivatives, requiring that all carbon trading be done on exchanges...The bankers say such a ban would be a mistake...The banks and companies may get their way on carbon derivatives in separate legislation now being worked out in Congress...
Financial experts are also opposed to cap and trade:
Even George Soros, the billionaire hedge fund operator, says money managers would find ways to manipulate cap-and-trade markets. “The system can be gamed,” Soros, 79, remarked at a London School of Economics seminar in July. “That’s why financial types like me like it -- because there are financial opportunities”...
Hedge fund manager Michael Masters, founder of Masters Capital Management LLC, based in St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands [and unrelated to Blythe Masters] says speculators will end up controlling U.S. carbon prices, and their participation could trigger the same type of boom-and-bust cycles that have buffeted other commodities...
The hedge fund manager says that banks will attempt to inflate the carbon market by recruiting investors from hedge funds and pension funds.
“Wall Street is going to sell it as an investment product to people that have nothing to do with carbon,” he says. “Then suddenly investment managers are dominating the asset class, and nothing is related to actual supply and demand. We have seen this movie before.”
Indeed, as I have previously pointed out, many environmentalists are opposed to cap and trade as well. For example:
Michelle Chan, a senior policy analyst in San Francisco for Friends of the Earth, isn’t convinced.
“Should we really create a new $2 trillion market when we haven’t yet finished the job of revamping and testing new financial regulation?” she asks. Chan says that, given their recent history, the banks’ ability to turn climate change into a new commodities market should be curbed...
“What we have just been woken up to in the credit crisis -- to a jarring and shocking degree -- is what happens in the real world,” she says...
Friends of the Earth’s Chan is working hard to prevent the banks from adding carbon to their repertoire. She titled a March FOE report “Subprime Carbon?” In testimony on Capitol Hill, she warned, “Wall Street won’t just be brokering in plain carbon derivatives -- they’ll get creative.”
How the Movie Ends

Yes, they'll get "creative", and we have seen this movie before ...an inadequately-regulated carbon derivatives boom will destabilize the economy and lead to another crash.

I have previously pointed out that CDS sellers - like the big sellers of other financial products - know that the government will bail them out if CDS crash again. So they have strong incentives to sell them and to recreate huge levels of leverage. Indeed, the same dynamic that led to the S&L crisis also led to last year's CDS crisis, and will lead to the next crisis as well. So - while CDS might be a particularly dangerous type of "weapon of mass destruction" (in Warren Buffet's words), the new carbon derivatives may very well become the new form of looting on the public's dime. If the government allows massive carbon derivatives trading with as little oversight as over the CDS market, taxpayers will end up spending many trillions bailing out the giant banks and propping up the economy when the carbon market bubble bursts.

And as I have previously pointed out: (1) the giant banks will make a killing on carbon trading, (2) while the leading scientist crusading against global warming says it won't work, and (3) there is a very high probability of massive fraud and insider trading in the carbon trading markets.


Global Elite Picked Obama Long Before Voters

Man recounts startling tale of first time he heard of Barack Obama—18 years ago in Russia
By Tom Fife
During the period of roughly February 1992 to mid-1994, I was making frequent trips to Moscow in the process of starting a software development, joint-venture company with some people from the Russian scientific community.

One of the men in charge on the Russian side was named V. M.; he had a wife named T.M. V. was a levelheaded scientist, while his wife was rather deeply committed to the losing communist cause.

Early in 1992, the American half of our venture was invited to V. & T.’s Moscow flat as we were about to return to the States. As the evening wore on, T. developed a decidedly rough anti-American edge—one her husband tried to quietly rein in.

The bottom line of the tirade she started against the United States went something like this:

“You Americans always like to think that you have the perfect government and your people are always so perfect. Well then, why haven’t you had a woman president by now? You had a chance to vote for a woman vice president and you didn’t do it.”

The general response went along the lines that you don’t vote for someone just because of their sex. Besides, you don’t vote for vice president, but the president and vice president as a ticket.

“Well, I think you are going to be surprised when you get a black president very soon,” she said. The consensus we expressed was that we didn’t think there was anything innately barring that. The right person at the
right time and sure, America would try to vote for the right person, be he or she, black or not.

“What if I told you that you will have a black president very soon and he will be a communist?” she said. “Well, you will; and he will be a communist.”

One of us asked, “It sounds like you know something we don’t know.”

“Yes, it is true,” she replied. “This is not some idle talk. He is already born, and he is educated and being groomed to be president right now. You will be impressed to know that he has gone to the best schools of presidents. He is what you call ‘Ivy League.’ You don’t believe me, but he is real and I even know his name. His name is Barack. His mother is white and American and his father is black from Africa. That’s right, a chocolate baby! And he’s going to be president.”

She became more and more smug as she presented her stream of detailed knowledge and predictions so matter-of-factly—as though all were foregone conclusions.

“It’s all been thought out. His father is not an American black, so he won’t have that social slave stigma. He is intelligent and he is half white and has been raised from the cradle to be an atheist and a communist. He’s gone to the finest schools. He is being guided every step of the way and he will be irresistible to America.”

She was obviously happy that the communists were doing this and that it would somehow be a thumbing of their collective noses at America: They would give us a black president and he’d be a communist to boot. She made it obvious that she thought that this was going to breathe new life into world communism. She always asserted that communism was far from dead. She was full of details about him that she was eager to relate.

She rattled off a complete litany. He was from Hawaii. He went to school in California. He lived in Chicago. He was soon to be elected to the legislature. “Have no doubt: he is one of us, a Soviet.”

Since I had dabbled in languages, I knew a smattering of Arabic. I commented: “If I remember correctly, ‘Barack’ comes from the Arabic word for ‘blessing.’ That seems to be an odd name for an American.” She
replied quickly, “Yes. It is ‘African,’’’ she insisted, “and he will be a blessing for world communism. We will regain our strength and become the No. 1 power in the world.”

She said something to the effect that America was at the same time the great hope and the great obstacle for communism. America would have to be converted to communism, and Barack was going to pave the way.

So, what does this conversation from 1992 prove? Well, it’s definitely anecdotal. It doesn’t prove that Obama has had Soviet communist training nor that he was groomed to be the first black American president, but it does show one thing that I think is important. It shows that Soviet Russian communists knew of Barack from a very early date. It also shows that they truly believed among themselves that he was raised and groomed communist to pave the way for their future.

This report on Barack came personally to me from one of them long before America knew he existed. Although I had never before heard of him, at the time of this conversation Obama was 30-plus years old and was obviously tested enough that he was their anticipated rising star.

Who is Tom Fife?

Tom Fife was a government contractor with an active security clearance who took notes on his trips for Defense Intelligence Agency debriefings within the Department of Defense. In 1992, following an astounding conversation at a dinner party in Moscow, he took down notes for future reference. It was long before the world ever heard the name “Barack Obama.”

Students of revisionist history will remember that Bill Clinton disappeared from Oxford University in England for a while in 1970 and surfaced in Moscow (courtesy of the CIA) purportedly to be trained in communism. When the accompanying story first appeared, we could not locate its source for confirmation and cast it off as a probable Internet fairy tale. But we have since interviewed Tom Fife, blended the information with the many accusations of high-profile politicos (such as former UN Ambassador Alan Keyes) and witnessed the communistic behavior of the White House occupant, and we have no of doubt the authenticity of this amazing piece. —Ed.
(Issue # 12, March 23, 2009)


FYI, when using google translate for japanese>english, generally what is translated "sealed" means 'secret,' i.e. classified.



christer svensson

Dear mr Fulford, far be it from me to disseminate facts or opinions that may compromise this outlet of freedom of expression.
As the subject matters covered are obtruse and occulted they are in need of references to say the least, let me in this venue ask of you your opinion on the works of a few authors "Who helped Hitler?
by I. M. Maĭskiĭ" "Geheimpolitik by Dieter Rüggeberg" and "the mythology of secret societies by J.M. Roberts"

If you should be interested in open source references to my previous entries I will be glad to submit them in the obvious interest of truth rather than stance on my behalf Best regards Christer Svensson




So what are those little boxes with numbers in them?


Today BoJ says it might join US and UK for quantitative easing.

Dollar collapse is once again proved to be undoable. The January "deadline" will turn out to be another hype.

By the way, many people will still believe this wishful thinking. Perhaps we should once again buy gold, sell usd, and take profit before January 2010.

Ben Rules

Today, I was accosted on a bulletin board I follow by a person that I have pieced together may be a Chinese spy. This character was going on and on about how everyone needs to be assigned a job, like Tiger Woods should not be allowed to play golf but rather should be assigned a job. Basically, I chided this point of view as "stalinist". AND THIS PERSON RESPONDED "how can you think calling someone Stalinist is an insult?"

This character, I believe, is Red Chinese. It scares me because obviously the Chinese have resources to troll on bulletin boards. But furthermore, this character started bragging... about how his side has PETA, IWF, Democratic Party etc etc on their side. He called David Suzuki and Al Gore geniuses...

I AM VERY CONCERNED THERE IS A RED CHINESE FIFTH COLUMN IN THE USA RIGHT NOW. Do you know anything about this ? He talked about how we all belong in a mental reeducation camp which is where he and his comrades would be putting us. He scared the crap out of me.

He claimed these were on their side:
* The Democratic Party
* New Labor
* IWU (?)
* WWF (world wildlife fund)
* PETA (!? who cares, i guess it is important)
* all of the unions
* the teachers/academia

Ben Rules

Benjamin -

It is *****so very important that the Japanese help preserve Silicon Valley*****. There are inventions afoot there that are under the radar that I know about that will bring about the recovery in short order.

Also please don't forget the generational picture. Gen X, Gen Y, Gen Z. Spare us. We didn't do anything. We need jobs, we need a chance. WE CAN TEACH ENGLISH. All of us can teach English and that ought to be worth some money. We DO NOT want to be killed.

Please understand that we need any action to take place with MEDICAL CONCERN AND CARE. If there needs to be surgery, let no damage be done to the patient as a whole - just let us all peacefully and without any CIA deportation bullshit manage to get to the new era.

You scared us with that CIA's gonna deport millions jibe recently. Are you kidding ?!? What can we do to stop this ?! Obviously using the Bill of Rights as toilet paper is nothing new. But certainly there is a way to thwart this madness !? Your Japanese contacts must help us, here in the USA. We have so much to offer if events leave us intact.

We love the Japanese people and we plea for their help through this coming era. We understand each nation is responsible for itself but trust us, the US people have not benefited whatsoever from their total eclipse by the agents of evil within government, media, military, economy, culture etc.


Can you please translate? Online translators don't do a good job because it is hard to understand.







Japanese to English translation:

Propaganda press reported the problem started shock Dubai, the rule of darkness you can see the way Western people have been brainwashed disintegrated. Ever-changing world situation and the negotiations behind the scenes into the final phase, the plan is nearing an end finally Illuminati world domination.
The propaganda media began reporting the problem shock Dubai is nearing bankruptcy because of the Fed and the Bank of England. World Bank and IMF are trying to buy that kind of money over the phone on a daily basis, is not bite. Japan's government has also bought all the current All Japan in foreign bonds. Have started to move steadily towards the launch of a new financial system.

The world more "warming" fabricated evidence was hacked and the data were published on the Internet. This Western society has fallen into great confusion. A matter of time before being tried for fraud Al Gore's Nobel Peace Prize. Exposure of this data has been fabricated and is just a tip of the iceberg. The darkness of the Western regime of the Western scientific progress that has been delayed after 100 years we will probably have been exposed. When revolution breaks out reveals that Western science has taken over organized crime.

Started in several places at home and abroad to build a plant using the technology was already sealed. The Pentagon "national security" was sealed in the name of 6,000 began to prepare for the patent or the general public. In the Philippines, has been meeting to stop environmental destruction, including the current Democratic lawmaker Ishii has participated in more than one person, such as the political fixer. Began work on the project began to clean the lake in the Philippines to start.

Latest information about this series, the Illuminati was the government of the darkness of the West, which describes the current state disintegrated and the world domination plans of the Bush faction, especially Dad. Other news of the secret meeting over the Yamashita treasure in the Philippines, about recent political maneuvering of the traitor in Japan, China's world domination agenda and, for the development and commercialization of technology that is sealed, the new financial and about how the system works.


These cases regarding Obama's eligibility still have legs.
Here is another case in the Appeals Process.
And note that Orley Taitz's case is also in Appeal.
So removing Obama by legal means continues to be pressed.

Appeals briefs scheduled in Obama eligibility challenge
'We look forward to moving ahead with this very important constitutional case'

By Bob Unruh

A briefing schedule has been announced by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a case alleging Congress failed in its constitutional duties by refusing to investigate the eligibility of Barack Obama to be president, according to an attorney handling the challenge.

WND previously reported on the lawsuit filed by lead plaintiff Charles F. Kerchner Jr. and others against Congress.

Attorney Mario Apuzzo filed the action in January on behalf of Kerchner, Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James Lenormand and Donald H. Nelson Jr. Named as defendants were Barack Hussein Obama II, the U.S., Congress, the Senate, House of Representatives and former Vice President Dick Cheney along with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

The case focuses on the alleged failure of Congress to follow the Constitution. That document, the lawsuit states, "provides that Congress must fully qualify the candidate 'elected' by the Electoral College Electors."

The case asserts "when Obama was born his father was a British subject/citizen and Obama himself was the same."

The Constitution also provides, the lawsuit says, "If the president-elect shall have failed to qualify, then the vice president elect shall act as president until a president shall have qualified."

"There existed significant public doubt and grievances from plaintiffs and other concerned Americans regarding Obama's eligibility to be president and defendants had the sworn duty to protect and preserve the Constitution and specifically under the 20th Amendment, Section 3, a Constitutional obligation to confirm whether Obama, once the electors elected him, was qualified," the case explained.

Now the attorney has posted an online statement that the brief on behalf of the appellants is due Jan. 4, 2010.

In an e-mail announcing the schedule, Kerchner wrote, "We look forward to moving ahead with this very important constitutional case along the legal pathway to the ultimate decision maker for this historic and precedence setting lawsuit, the U.S. Supreme Court."

He continued. "They will determine the answer to the pressing legal question of what is a 'natural born citizen' of the USA per Article II constitutional standards and did Obama and the U.S. Congress violate the Constitution and statutory laws and my constitutional rights during the 2008 election cycle."

"I say Obama does not meet the founders and framers intent for the Article II eligibility clause. I say Obama is a deceiver and a usurper," he wrote today.

Apuzzo earlier argued in his notice of appeal that the district court judge "avoided" a conclusion on the merits of the case.

"We allege that Obama has not conclusively proven that he was born in Hawaii. More importantly, we also allege that he is not an Article II 'natural born Citizen' because when Obama was born his father was a British subject/citizen and Obama himself was the same," he wrote.

The lawyer said it is important that the court did not rule Obama was born in Hawaii, nor did it rule that the claim was frivolous.

It simply said the case was dismissed because of a jurisdiction issue.

"By the court finding that plaintiffs do not have standing and that their claims present a political question, the court was able to avoid having to address the underlying merits of the Kerchner case. With such a decision, the American people unfortunately still do not know where Obama was born and whether he is an Article II 'natural born Citizen' and therefore constitutionally eligible to be president and commander in chief," the attorney said.

"A court cannot refuse to hear a case on the merits merely because it prefers not to due to grave social or political ramifications," he continued. "The court's opinion dismissing the Kerchner complaint/petition did not address the real Kerchner case but rather looked for a way to dismiss the case without having to reach the merits of the question of whether Obama is an Article II 'natural born citizen.'

"The American people deserve to know whether Obama was in fact born in Hawaii. More importantly, even if he is born in Hawaii, given that he was born with dual allegiance and citizenship, the American people deserve to know whether he is an Article II 'natural born citizen' which would make him eligible to be president," the attorney said.

WND reported earlier when Kerchner publicly argued the courts have an obligation to make a decision on Obama's eligibility.

He wrote, "The federal courts and judges are committing treason to the Constitution by not taking jurisdiction and getting to the merits in the various cases before them regarding the Article II eligibility clause question for Obama."

He said his basis for such a statement is the opinion of U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall, who wrote in an 1821 case, Cohens vs. Virginia:

"It is most true that this court will not take jurisdiction if it should not: but it is equally true, that it must take jurisdiction if it should. The judiciary cannot, as the legislature may, avoid a measure because it approaches the confines of the constitution. We cannot pass it by because it is doubtful. With whatever doubts, with whatever difficulties, a case may be attended, we must decide it, if it be brought before us. We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the constitution. Questions may occur which we would gladly avoid; but we cannot avoid them. All we can do is, to exercise our best judgment, and conscientiously to perform our duty. In doing this, on the present occasion, we find this tribunal invested with appellate jurisdiction in all cases arising under the constitution and laws of the United States. We find no exception to this grant, and we cannot insert one."
WND has reported on dozens of legal challenges to Obama's status as a "natural born citizen." The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Some of the lawsuits question whether he was actually born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time.

Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.

Further, others question his citizenship by virtue of his attendance in Indonesian schools during his childhood and question on what passport did he travel to Pakistan three decades ago.

Adding fuel to the fire is Obama's persistent refusal to release documents that could provide answers and the appointment – at a cost confirmed to be at least $1.7 million – of myriad lawyers to defend against all requests for his documentation. While his supporters cite an online version of a "Certification of Live Birth" from Hawaii as his birth verification, critics point out such documents actually were issued for children not born in the state.

The ultimate questions remain unaddressed to date: Is Obama a natural born citizen, and, if so, why hasn't documentation been provided? And, of course, if he is not, what does it mean to the 2008 election or the U.S. Constitution if it is revealed that there has been a violation?

WND has reported on another case that was dismissed by U.S. District Judge David Carter in California. It also now is heading to the appeals level.

WND also has reported that among the documentation not yet available for Obama includes his kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and his adoption records.

Because of the dearth of information about Obama's eligibility, WND founder Joseph Farah has launched a campaign to raise contributions to post billboards asking a simple question: "Where's the birth certificate?"

The campaign followed a petition that has collected more than 480,000 signatures demanding proof of his eligibility, the availability of yard signs raising the question and the production of permanent, detachable magnetic bumper stickers asking the question.

The "certification of live birth" posted online and widely touted as "Obama's birth certificate" does not in any way prove he was born in Hawaii, since the same "short-form" document is easily obtainable for children not born in Hawaii. The true "long-form" birth certificate – which includes information such as the name of the birth hospital and attending physician – is the only document that can prove Obama was born in Hawaii, but to date he has not permitted its release for public or press scrutiny.

Oddly, though congressional hearings were held to determine whether Sen. John McCain was constitutionally eligible to be president as a "natural born citizen," no controlling legal authority ever sought to verify Obama's claim to a Hawaiian birth.


Orley Taitz could not get anywhere with her cases against Obama, but here is another case against Obama:

Formal treason charges filed against Barrack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, reach Monroe County Tennessee Grand Jury - Tuesday December 1, 2009
Obama Treason Charges Advance In Tennessee Grand Jury

By JB Williams Saturday, November 28, 2009

On June 10, 2009 I wrote about formal treason charges filed against Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, in - Is Obama Guilty of Treason? I followed that column up with - Why Commander Fitzpatrick Is NOT Guilty of Mutiny! on June 13. Since then, numerous others have filed similar treason charges against Obama/Soetoro with little or no fanfare…

If Obama is indeed guilty of treason - then we have a growing list of folks who are also committing treason. Namely, every member of law enforcement and the justice system who have taken an oath to uphold and defend the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic - along with every individual in Washington DC and beyond who has chosen to look the other way while denying American citizens their day in court - claiming that no citizen has the “legal standing” to ask who in the hell Barack Hussein Obama really is…

After visits from the Secret Service and months of rejection by the courts, Commander Walter Fitzpatrick may get his day in court.

On Tuesday December 1st 2009, Retired Navy Commander Walter Fitzpatrick III will present the evidence behind his treason complaint against Obama/Soetoro to all thirteen members of a Tennessee Grand Jury in Monroe County Tennessee.

The road to justice has been bumpy, to say the least. Commander Fitzpatrick has been ridiculed, blocked in court house halls, threatened, accused of mutiny and labeled a “crackpot” by Obama supporters who see no need for a standard background check for the most powerful office in the world.

Fitzpatrick had to go so far as to file criminal obstruction charges against Grand Jury Foreman Pettway before he would gain access to the court.  Despite it all, Commander Fitzpatrick forged ahead and on December 1st, his complaint will be heard by his local Monroe County Tennessee Grand Jury.

Now, this places the Tennessee Grand Jury squarely in the middle of the biggest Constitutional Crisis in U.S. history. Fitzpatrick will be under oath before the Grand Jury on Tuesday. If the Grand Jury has any doubts about Fitzpatrick’s testimony, they must arrest him for perjury on the spot. If they don’t arrest him for perjury, they are accepting his testimony as true and accurate…

If Article II—Section I—Clause V of the U.S. Constitution means nothing—then no part of the Constitution means anything today. On the other hand, if the Monroe County Tennessee Grand Jury follows its oath to uphold, protect and preserve the Constitution and apply the law equally to all, then the charge of treason must be allowed its day in court.

The Monroe County Grand Jury appears ready to act on its oath and authority. But if they don’t, they could become thirteen new members of a long list of folks equally guilty of treason, for turning their heads the other way and denying the American people access to the courts in what might be the greatest case in U.S. political history.

Thirteen members of the Monroe County Grand Jury hold the future of Constitutional Law in their hands. Come Tuesday, they will have an opportunity to keep their oath to the American people - the citizens of Monroe County and state of Tennessee. Of course, they will also have an opportunity to do what several civil and criminal court judges have already done on the matter. They can turn their heads and deny citizens their right to be heard…

But with each passing day, the stakes get higher and higher in the case over who Obama/Soetoro really is and whom he really serves. Atop the growing list of unconstitutional acts by the Obama administration is the Samson Alabama story in which—”
An Army investigation has found that the use of armed military policemen from Fort Rucker in response to mass murders in Samson violated federal law.” —reports the Associated Press.

“The Army earlier confirmed that 22 military police and an officer were sent to Samson after the mass slaying of 10 people on March 10. - The Department of Army Inspector General found a violation of the Posse Comitatus Act, which restrains the use of the military for civilian law enforcement purposes.”

Yet ten months after inauguration, Obama’s entire past remains a mystery under lock and key. Obama has spent almost $2 million in legal fees to keep his life Top Secret, not counting millions in tax-payer funded road blocks thrown up by Obama’s Justice Department, which has sent numerous federal attorneys into court after court to file dismissal requests on the basis of “standing” - with great success. They don’t want the courts to ever decide Obama’s Constitutional eligibility on “merit,” because if discovery ever goes forward and Obama’s files are opened up, Obama is finished and so is his Marxist Global Agenda!

Make no mistake… The courts have clearly ruled that NO AMERICAN CITIZEN has the “proper standing” to ask even the most fundamental questions about Barack Hussein Obama (aka Barry Soetoro). The American press has not only ignored these facts, but mocked anyone willing to ask the right questions - of the right people - in the right way.

Tuesday, the Monroe County Grand Jury will get an opportunity to make history and reverse the modern trend of denying citizens their day in court. The people have a right to know who and what Obama really is. Let’s see if the Monroe County Grand Jury has the backbone to force Obama to answer that question.

When an unconstitutional resident of the White House rushes a laundry list of unconstitutional policies through, including the use of the Military against U.S. citizens—against the demands of the American citizens, it’s time to ask some very serious questions and the American people deserve no less than honest answers.

The Monroe County Grand Jury will hear these and other charges Tuesday December 1st. God help this nation if they lack the courage to take a stand with the citizenry of this great nation.  The future of American justice hangs in the balance! The people deserve much more than a simple birth certificate. They deserve a legitimate government - limited to its constitutional authority - and they deserve a justice system willing to uphold those foundational principles and values.

All eyes across this nation will be on Monroe County Tennessee this week!


Lord Rees (Royal Society) to be asked by UEA to investigate CRU leak. - got that from the web. If true, Lord Rees is a fat zionist bozo.

wild hominoid

Licht Raver





2009年10月31日  田中 宇




 温暖化対策推進者たちはモンクトンに陰謀論者のレッテルを貼っている。しかし、モンクトンは自らの主張の証拠として、国連の気候変動枠組み条約会議のウェブサイト <URL> にある、同会議の作業部会が今年10月にタイのバンコクでの会議の結果としてまとめた条約草案のファイルを提示している。そのファイルをみると、確かにモンクトンが指摘するように、18-19ページに、条約を実行するための機関として、先進国が出した金を管理する「政府」(government)と、先進国から金を集める仕掛け、途上国に金を出す仕掛けという3つの柱を作ると書いてある。








 先進国の側は、すでに崩れ出している。EUではCOP15の新条約に関して、先進国から途上国に金を渡す新基金を作ることは各国が合意した。だが、EU27カ国のどの国がどれだけの額を新基金に拠出するかについて話がまとまらなかった。ポーランドなど東欧諸国は、自国の負担を増やす話に反対し、あらかじめ各国の負担額を決めたいと主張するが、ドイツなどEU内の大国はそこを曖昧なままにしたい考えで、意見が対立している。(EU leaders fail to agree on climate change fund)

 温暖化対策の枠組み条約の仕組みは、世界を、工業国(Annex I)と途上国に分け、工業国の中でも先進国(G7諸国と他の西欧諸国、豪州。Annex II)だけが途上国の温暖化対策を資金援助することになっている。東欧諸国は工業国だが先進国ではない。東欧は、同じEUにいるというだけで西欧先進国と同基準の支払いを迫られるのは不当だと言っているが、西欧諸国はその辺を曖昧にしておきたい。この問題は簡単に解決できそうもない。(United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change)

 ドイツのメルケル首相は10月31日、COP15で京都議定書の後継となる新条約を締結できる見込みは低下したと表明した。EUは、世界の先進国が出すべき基金の合計額については決議したが、その基金の中でEUがどれだけの額を負担するかは決められなかった。つまり、EUは金を出すことを決議できなかった。その一方で、途上国の多くは、金がもらえるなら新条約に署名しても良いが、もらえないなら署名しないと表明している。(Merkel: no chance of Kyoto-style agreement at Copenhagen)(United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (Copenhagen Talks))

 米政府は、COP15で新条約がまとまるならオバマ大統領自身が署名しに行くつもりだったが、まとまる見通しがないので行かないことにしたと宣言した。米議会では地球温暖化対策法案が審議されているが、審議の速度は遅く、COP15には間に合わない。オバマは12月10日にオスロで行われるノーベル授賞式に参加し、そこで環境問題を含めた演説をする。オスロはCOP15開催地のコペンハーゲンの近くなので、COP15に出て行うべき演説はオスロでやれると米政府は言っている。英国は、オバマにCOP15に参加してもらって成功に結びつけようとしたがダメだった。(Obama not going to Copenhagen)


 10月25日、英国の議会で温暖化対策法が可決された。2050年までに排出量を8割削減するという大胆なものだった。英当局は、法案可決を求める環境保護団体が英議会の屋根に登って大騒ぎするのをほとんど制止せず黙認し、騒ぎをテレビで中継させて温暖化対策を支持する世論を盛り上げようとした。議案は賛成463、反対3で可決された。(The real climate change catastrophe)(Greenpeace activists spend night on Houses of Parliament roof in climate change protest)

 しかし、真に象徴的だったのは、審議の際に反対派議員の一人(Peter Lilley)が「外は雪が降っていますよ」と指摘したことだ。ロンドンではこの日、10月としては74年ぶりに雪が降った。温暖化対策法が可決された日、10月の降雪という寒冷化を象徴する現象が起きていたことになる。10月の観測史上最低気温は今年、米カリフォルニア州やカナダでも記録された。


 どうやら地球の気候変動は、人為的な温室効果ガスの排出よりも、太陽黒点の活動によるところが多いようだ。英国では、地球温暖化を強調(誇張)する政府の広告キャンペーンに対する批判が多く出て、広告の誇張を監督する機関(Advertising Standards Authority)が調査に乗り出した。米国でも、地球温暖化を信じる人は減っている。shows)








The comments to this entry are closed.