« RE: chodoin | Main | ベンジャミン・フルフォード新刊「図解 世界を牛耳る巨大企業」発売のお知らせ »

10/29/2012

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c647c53ef017ee48c1808970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Weekly Geopolitical News and Analysis20121029: Bush the boogey man plays the HAARP as Halloween approaches:

Comments

Otto Lund

Human-etisk Forbunds og Foreningen Skepsis interesse for okkulte sexovergrep mot barn http://skepsisforvoksne.wordpress.com/2012/11/06/human-etisk-forbunds-og-foreningen-skepsis-interesse-for-okkulte-sexovergrep-mot-barn/ gt ~ Humanist Association and the Association Skepticism interest in occult sex crimes against children http://tinyurl.com/coy8ja3

Hvorfor utviser skepsis.no Jørgen Skavland og Asbjørn Dyrendal m. fl. beviselig farlig inkompetanse? http://www.navigate3d.no/mbbs22/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=1813&start=1 * Sceptic society is part of Fabian Society and their Secret Agenda http://www.navigate3d.no/mbbs22/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=1810&start=1

Otto Lund

A man of the people imprisoned, google { marius reikerås https://www.google.no/search?q=marius+reikerås }, youtube { marius reikerås http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=marius+reikerås }, Norwegian divers struggle for recognition - 19 Mar 08 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3vNeaAZvEQ , Orkdal barnevern under sterk kritikk fra kunder, advokatfirma, kommuneadministrasjon og noen ansatte http://www.navigate3d.no/mbbs22/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=1825&start=1

nobody

Well, that's an interesting story Ben, but I'm waiting to see if this election will benefit Obama, Romney, none of the above, or if it's just part of the global push to get everyone to buy the deception of climate change as they play with their weather machines. Seems to me that Romney knows about weather tech just like Obama does, so if Romney really wanted to get elected he would just tel the truth about that. This logically indicates that both sides want to rule through deception which seems plausible so they work within these "rules of the game" where they never tell certain truths and they both strive to rule "the people" within those rules.

Again, for the third time Ben, promote these two websites:

www.culturaltuning.org
www.thesunsetsaga.com

Claire

No comments all month? I think your credibility has about played out. Maybe you could redeem yourself by reporting on the $43 trillion dollar lawsuit that Rense, Alex Jones, even Max and Stacy are mysteriously silent about.
Spire Law Group filed the suit - give them a call, cover the story, or prove once and for all that you are just another little screwdriver in the bankster tool kit.

tora

愛が答えではありませんでした。
善い行いが答えです。

love is not the answer.
good deed is the answer.

Angus James Keefe

Wow, that really impressed me! I like your ideas.Thanks for sharing your concept! Cheers

mtjoeng

Concerning the NAZI faction, both the historic & the existing one,
I have come to conclude that the NAZI 'movement', originates

from the generational incestuous luciferian milieu,
where as children, routine abuse & rape was their norm,
and as grownups, they turn into raping,
sacrificing, murderous, demon possessed psychopaths,
(their military faction, the sodomite SS-style, providing the handbooks for modern torture to the later Schools of the Americas)

through what would be historically,
the cult of the white caucasian Khazar heathen,

whose issue, these days, mingle, insanely,
with the conquerors of WW2, their Illuminati controllers,
your representatives & captains of industry, Zionists,
your mayors, your Wallstreet bankers,
your media, Hollywood, your movie plots, soaps, and producer gild,

in Europe, they propagated the mutts
that occupy Windsor Castle & the House of Orange (where I am),
these supposed bloodlines, fake as hell,
for both the Windows and the Oranges (where I live)
the issue of Khazars, Goths, the castle cookie & Moroccan Israelites,
and any passerby, that could fill the hole of infertility,
due to the endless infections of sexually transmittable diseases,
or by bold substitution of the emptying of a present crib, suitable,

used as symbols for mind control, themselves under perpetual
fear of exposure, all the time enticed to do evil,
the database of all their wrongdoing,
the rape, kill & hunt of masses of boy and girl children & virgin victims,
under control of the present lucifer hierarchy in the City of London

one of a your audience

ベンジャミン様
youtubeや書籍で、よく拝見させていただいてます。

さて、アイスランドにて国民が民間銀行に NO! をつきつけ、
銀行を国有化に戻し、国民の借金を民間銀行に払う必要が無くなったようです。

日本のマスコミはもとより、3大ネットワークでも報じられていないようです。
これから世界はどうなるのでしょうか?ギリシャもこれに続くのでしょうか?
アイスランドは報復を受けるのでしょうか?

もし記事に取り上げる機会がありましたら、あなたの強力な記事として取り上げて下さい。

一方的なお願い(書き込み)で申し訳ありませんが、よろしくお願いします。

Free Energy

Corrected text of my last comment

Unlimited Energy is not a viable option?

What would happen if we had unlimited clean energy? What would be the social/monetary effects of having unlimited energy?

Assuming that energy becomes clean and unlimited: Almost nothing is completely free, you still have to pay for the sites where it's produced. Even if the innovation is self-replicating robots, you still pay transmission or installation fees, and the royalties on the patents. And free energy generators and motors will still need replacement and repair. Think of it this way. Data communication is basically free but we're still paying the cable companies to hook us up to the Internet.

More international travel and trade. It will be cheaper to transport people and goods, and faster because there's no need to go slow to save energy. This will increase tourism and ordering goods from afar, which will in turn create more globalization, interdependence and slave labor in poor countries. If you want cheap foods for dinner you'll order it on Amazon and they'll ship it from Brazil. The agriculture in developed countries will collapse due to foreign competition. If you want to buy cheap products you'll order it on Aliexpress and they'll ship it from China. The exploiters of chinese slave labor (foreign companies and partners in the Communist government) will become more and more successful.

Everything gets bigger. As manufacturing costs, transportation costs, and heating / cooling costs decrease people will build bigger homes, bigger cars, and bigger cities, reversing the recent trends towards sustainable consumption. Everybody will drive a hummer the size of a bus. This will shift resources and environmental pressures elsewhere.

Energy would no longer be a constraint on production, but the shortage of other commodities would. Productivity would increase in the short term and prices would remain stable, but ultimately there would be population pressures and shortages of commodities, food and fresh water (especially in poor countries rich in natural resources).

Having an endless supply of energy does not give you enough lithium for batteries, rare earth elements for electronic components, metals and steels for vehicles, ships and aircraft, cement and glass for buildings and foods for people, nor does it increase the supply of arable land.

Looking this over, it seems as if the first worlds will become a giant Las Vegas or Disneyland.

No doubt some financial analysts (cabal) have thought this through, on the unlikely but conceivable chance that this will actually happen and they'll be able to trade on it before the rest of the market.

Furthermore, only the people who had the means of producing unlimited clean energy would have access to it still. So those without the means of production would be in the same situation; financially held ransom by those who have.

If not viable for companies to maintain the infrastructure in order to produce this unlimited energy devices and still make a profit, then the consumer would be in exactly the same position; held to ransom by those who did provide it as the prices would then start to increase until the status quo was met (profitability)

Similarly, it is unlikely that even if there was unlimited clean energy if you looked at the situation globally, because of political/ethnic differences/conflicts, problems would still arise in control, perceived 'ownership' and distribution of that energy. Some countries would be energy rich, others energy poor.

As individuals (and countries) we could never have free energy, because of the issues outlined above (selfishness) and the ever increasing demand would mean that our need/want for this energy would be infinite and spiral ever upwards.

There would be an impact on the natural environment, even if the energy was clean, because it 'd have more consumption and production in the atmosphere due to unlimited energy and our arrogant misconception that we can alter natural systems permanently without consequences.

Tell me how to solve these problems

Viva la revolucion!

The disintegration of the Chinese motherland has begun, it will only be a few decades before the complete break-up of this idiotic country into more manageable, far better and diversified nation states, similar to European Union. The Chinese central gov't have proven themselves incapable of maintaining a good country. Viva la revolucion!

Communists are Satanists! Death to the Communists!

Free Energy

Free Energy Apocalypse

What would happen if we had unlimited clean energy? What would be the social/monetary effects of having unlimited energy?

Assuming that energy becomes clean and unlimited: Almost nothing is completely free, you still have to pay for the sites where it's produced. Even if the innovation is self-replicating robots, you still pay transmission or installation fees, and the royalties on the inevitable patents. And free energy generators and motors will still need replacement and repair. Think of it this way. Data communication is basically free but we're still paying the cable companies to hook us up to the Internet.

More travel, trade and interdependence. It will be cheaper to transport people and goods, and faster because there's no need to go slow to save energy. This will increase tourism and ordering goods from afar, which will in turn create more globalization, more interdependence and more exploitation of slave labor in poor countries. If you want cheap lettuce and rice for dinner you'll order it on Amazon that morning and they'll ship it from Brazil. The regional agriculture in developed countries will perish due to foreign competition. If you want to buy cheap products you'll order it on Aliexpress and they'll ship it from China. The exploiters of slave labor (foreign companies and associates in China) will become more and more successful.

Everything gets bigger and more polluting. As manufacturing costs, transportation costs, and heating / cooling costs decrease people will build bigger homes, bigger cars, and bigger cities, reversing the recent trends towards sustainable and modest consumption. Everybody will drive a hummer the size of a bus. This will shift resources and environmental pressures elsewhere.

Energy would no longer be a constraint on production, but the shortage of other commodities would. Productivity would increase in the short term and prices would remain stable, but ultimately there would be population pressures and shortages of commodities, food and fresh water (especially in poor countries rich in natural resources). Having an endless supply of energy does not give you enough lithium for batteries, electronic components, vehicles, ships, aircraft, buildings and foods, nor does it increase the supply of arable land.

Looking this over, it seems as if the developed countries will become a giant Las Vegas or Disneyland.

No doubt some financial analysts (Illuminati/cabal) have thought this through, on the unlikely but conceivable chance that this will actually happen and they'll be able to trade on it before the rest of the market.

Furthermore, only the people who had the means of producing unlimited clean energy would have access to it still. So those without the means of production would be in the same situation; financially held ransom by those who have.

If this unlimited source of clean energy market was so competitive that it was not viable for companies to maintain the infrastructure in order to produce this unlimited energy devices and still make a profit, then the consumer would be in exactly the same position; held to ransom by those who did provide it as the prices would then start to increase until the status quo was met (profitability)

Similarly, it is unlikely that even if there was unlimited clean energy if you looked at the situation globally, because of development, political, ethnic differences/conflicts, problems would still arise in control, perceived 'ownership' and distribution of that energy. Some countries would be energy rich, others energy poor.

As individuals (and countries) we could never have free energy, because of the issues outlined above (competition and selfishness) and the ever increasing demand would mean that our need/want for this energy would spiral ever upwards.

There would be an impact on the natural environment and climate, even if the energy was clean, because it would be MORE energy in the atmosphere as our use accelerated due to unlimited clean energy supplies and our arrogant misconception that we can alter natural systems permanently without consequences.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.